From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:54:45 +0000 Message-ID: <569E4025.7080003@citrix.com> References: <1453142404-8819-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1453196796.6020.217.camel@citrix.com> <569E3C86.20407@citrix.com> <1453211428.29930.44.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1453211428.29930.44.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Xen-devel Cc: George Dunlap , Tim Deegan , Doug Goldstein , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 19/01/16 13:50, Ian Campbell wrote: > >>> What about nested virt? >> Nested virt is completely broken with respect to migration. > Sorry, I meant impact (generally) on nested, not WRT migration. AIUI shadow > is required for either L1 or L2 (not sure which). There is no requirement one way or another. It function in any combination you care to pick. However, if you don't have HAP all the way down, Xen falls over very quickly with spinlock contention if a guest actually starts doing some real work. ~Andrew