From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] public/io/netif.h: change semantics of "request-multicast-control" flag Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:35:40 +0100 Message-ID: <56A0FACC.7020301@citrix.com> References: <1453294249-6346-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> <1453390176.4320.47.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aMHH2-0006hN-I8 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:35:48 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1453390176.4320.47.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Paul Durrant , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Keir Fraser , Ian Jackson , Wei Liu , Jan Beulich , Tim Deegan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org El 21/01/16 a les 16.29, Ian Campbell ha escrit: > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 12:50 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote: >> My patch b2700877 "move and amend multicast control documentation" >> clarified use of the multicast control protocol between frontend and >> backend. However, it transpires that the restrictions that documentation >> placed on the "request-multicast-control" flag make it hard for a >> frontend to enable 'all multicast' promiscuous mode, in that to do so >> would require the frontend and backend to disconnect and re-connect. >> >> This patch adds a new "feature-dynamic-multicast-control" flag to allow >> a backend to advertise that it will watch "request-multicast-control" hence >> allowing it to be meaningfully modified by the frontend at any time rather >> than only when the frontend and backend are disconnected. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant >> Cc: Ian Campbell >> Cc: Ian Jackson >> Cc: Jan Beulich >> Cc: Keir Fraser >> Cc: Tim Deegan > > > This looks good to me, but also adding Wei (Linux netback + BSD stuff) and > Roger (BSD stuff) for their perspective. > > I should probably have done that for the last set of netif.h changes too, > since apart from the nominal maintainers of xen/include/public/io/*.h it's > worth getting input from the maintainers of the consumers. Not sure we can > express that very well in MAINTAINERS :-(. I'm going to leave this one to Wei, he has more experience than me regarding FreeBSD netfront (and xen-net related topics). FWIW, a quick and dirty grep on FreeBSD netfront doesn't show any results for "request-multicast-control", so I guess it's not implemented. Roger.