From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933978AbcAYR1Q (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:27:16 -0500
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:16027 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S933952AbcAYR1B (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:27:01 -0500
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,345,1449561600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="35889844"
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/fpu: Fix FNSAVE usage in eagerfpu mode
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
References: <cover.1453675014.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <60662444e13c76f06e23c15c5dcdba31b4ac3d67.1453675014.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <56A641FC.1030302@linux.intel.com>
 <CALCETrVjt3qcbrBa5BQ36ieQtL=JCwy_0n1JvF+tvLV0FVE-wg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <56A65AE3.9040405@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:26:59 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVjt3qcbrBa5BQ36ieQtL=JCwy_0n1JvF+tvLV0FVE-wg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 01/25/2016 09:25 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Even if we do the cleanup, I think I'd rather fix the bug in place
> first so the diff is clearer and then clean it up on top of that.
> 
> Does that seem reasonable?

Yup, sounds fine to me.