From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aOL52-0003vn-0k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 03:03:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aOL4y-0000t4-Qt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 03:03:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]:35762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aOL4y-0000sQ-Jr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 03:03:52 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id 123so1782705wmz.2 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:03:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1453832250-766-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56A879E4.80608@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:03:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1453832250-766-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/37] clean include files to use osdep.h List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: patches@linaro.org On 26/01/2016 19:16, Peter Maydell wrote: > This is a big fat patchset that touches nearly 800 files, > but it's all automated use of scripts/clean-includes. > This doesn't cover the whole tree, but it does get all > of target-* and hw/ and some other bits. > I split the patches up mostly roughly by entries in > MAINTAINERS, and also with some more ad-hoc splitting > at the end of the series. The final larger patch is > the "everything else in hw" bit -- I stopped when I > got down to a diffstat that wasn't too stupidly huge and > there weren't any more obvious neat carve-outs. > > I propose to apply this directly to master in the not too > distant future, since the consensus appears to be that that's > overall less painful than trying to split it all between > maintainer trees for a purely mechanical change. > > There will then be another similar series which picks up > the remaining stuff. Agreed, thanks for doing this! Paolo