All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
	adrian.hunter@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: use the defined function to check whether card is removable
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:38:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56AAB49B.401@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454025177-21233-1-git-send-email-jh80.chung@samsung.com>

Hi Jaehoon,

On 2016/1/29 7:52, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> In linux/mmc/host.h, mmc_card_is_removable() is already defined.
> There is no reason that it doesn't use.
>

It's good to use it. But, I find some host drivers also use
"caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE". How about respin a patchset to
slove them ?  :)

> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 9 ++++-----
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index f95d41f..9da9b60 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -2532,7 +2532,7 @@ int mmc_detect_card_removed(struct mmc_host *host)
>   	if (!card)
>   		return 1;
>
> -	if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE)
> +	if (!mmc_card_is_removable(host))
>   		return 0;
>
>   	ret = mmc_card_removed(card);
> @@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
>   		return;
>
>   	/* If there is a non-removable card registered, only scan once */
> -	if ((host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) && host->rescan_entered)
> +	if (!mmc_card_is_removable(host) && host->rescan_entered)
>   		return;
>   	host->rescan_entered = 1;
>
> @@ -2587,8 +2587,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
>   	 * if there is a _removable_ card registered, check whether it is
>   	 * still present
>   	 */
> -	if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead
> -	    && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE))
> +	if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead && mmc_card_is_removable(host))
>   		host->bus_ops->detect(host);
>
>   	host->detect_change = 0;
> @@ -2613,7 +2612,7 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
>   	mmc_bus_put(host);
>
>   	mmc_claim_host(host);
> -	if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) && host->ops->get_cd &&
> +	if (mmc_card_is_removable(host) && host->ops->get_cd &&
>   			host->ops->get_cd(host) == 0) {
>   		mmc_power_off(host);
>   		mmc_release_host(host);
>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin


  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-29  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-28 23:52 [PATCH] mmc: core: use the defined function to check whether card is removable Jaehoon Chung
2016-01-29  0:38 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2016-02-02 13:11 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-02-04  5:56   ` Jaehoon Chung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56AAB49B.401@rock-chips.com \
    --to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.