From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: PGNet Dev Subject: Re: Clarifying PVH mode requirements Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:49:14 -0800 Message-ID: <56AF7E7A.1040305@gmail.com> References: <56AE7C3B.7010100@gmail.com> <56AF3336.7040906@citrix.com> <56AF679E.4040104@oracle.com> Reply-To: PGNet Dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56AF679E.4040104@oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, roger.pau@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/01/2016 06:11 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > This actually never happened for Linux: HVMlite showed up fast enough > that it didn't make sense anymore to add 32-bit support to Linux > (especially given that AMD was still not supported). Is 'HVMLite' replacing 'PVH'? Or are they separate modes?