From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: Status of multiboot2 support on EFI? Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 21:24:16 +0000 Message-ID: <56B11E80.8040609@citrix.com> References: <56B0E0FE.3020806@gmail.com> <56B0E322.90203@citrix.com> <20160202204959.GL3485@olila.local.net-space.pl> <56B11980.4070103@gmail.com> <20160202212054.GN3485@olila.local.net-space.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160202212054.GN3485@olila.local.net-space.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Daniel Kiper , PGNet Dev Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/02/2016 21:20, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 01:02:56PM -0800, PGNet Dev wrote: >> Here http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_EFI#Xen_as_gz_binary refers >> to original discussion in 2013 (work has been deferred to Xen 4.6. ) >> >> and says "work has been deferred to Xen 4.6." >> >>> I think that this should be Xen 4.8 target. >> That's roughly another year+ from now for EFI support? >> >> Per, http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Roadmap, there's no 4.8 >> info at all. >> >> But 8months plus 4.7 release =~ Feb 2017? > Sadly I am not able to devote 100% of my time to this project right now. > Maybe it will happen when I finish our internal work. However, I think > that there is another option. You can help with some stuff on this issue. > This way we may finish whole project a bit earlier. > > Daniel > > PS I can post latest patchset (it does not contain all suggested fixes) > rebased on latest master. This way you can continue your work in > more friendly environment. Is it sufficient for you? Posting your latest code would be useful if anyone else wanted to progress it in the meantime. ~Andrew