From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58383) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRF9b-0003Ji-7s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 03:20:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRF9Z-0004JY-Pp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 03:20:38 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRF9Z-0004J5-EN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 03:20:37 -0500 References: <1454380581-7881-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <56B18788.9050807@redhat.com> <20160203090949.GB4666@var.home> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: <56B309C6.8000803@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:20:22 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160203090949.GB4666@var.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/17] Net patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Samuel Thibault Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , QEMU Developers , maethor@subiron.org On 02/03/2016 05:09 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jason Wang, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 12:52:24 +0800, wrote: >>> Hi. I'm afraid this failed to build on w32: >>> >>> declaration specifiers or =E2=80=98...=E2=80=99 before =E2=80=98sa_fa= mily_t=E2=80=99 >> - switch to use unsigned short >> - or typedef sa_family_t as unsigned short for windows > Doing the second runs the risk of windows eventually catching up with > what posix requires. Using unsigned short instead should be fine. > > Samuel Ok, fixed and will submit V2 of pull request soon.