From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55563) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRIlu-0004rc-9T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:12:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRIlp-0005nq-3i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 07:12:26 -0500 References: <1453978470-222624-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <1453978688-222752-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20160128140212.GS3869@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160128180031.1d940e2f@nial.brq.redhat.com> <20160203175504.GI26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160203205556-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <56B33676.6000502@redhat.com> <56B338F3.8000500@suse.de> From: Marcel Apfelbaum Message-ID: <56B3401D.8020601@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:12:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56B338F3.8000500@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qdev & hw/core owner? (was Re: [PATCH v19 7/9] machine: add properties to compat_props incrementaly) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= , Paolo Bonzini Cc: agraf@suse.de, Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , ghammer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann , cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, Igor Mammedov , rth@twiddle.net, lersek@redhat.com, Peter Maydell , david@gibson.dropbear.id.au On 02/04/2016 01:41 PM, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: > Am 04.02.2016 um 12:31 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> On 03/02/2016 20:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:55:04PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 06:00:31PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>>> [...] >>>>> It looks like this series might go nowhere but this patch >>>>> is not tied to it and useful to us in general >>>>> so perhaps you could pick it up after ACKs from >>>>> S390/SPAPR maintainers. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost >>>> >>>> We don't have a maintainer for hw/core/machine.c, hw/core/qdev*, >>>> and related files. >>>> >>>> Assuming we don't have a volunteer to maintain them officially, >>>> can we agree on a default destination for those patches so they >>>> don't linger on the list? Michael? Andreas? >>> >>> Not me please. Have too much on my plate. >>> Would you like to maintain it yourself? >> >> That's my suggestion too. I guess Igor and I could help with reviews, >> but testing and sending the pull requests would add too much work. >> Since you're the main one touching it, it makes sense for you to handl= e it. > > You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marce= l > who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it. Hi, As I previously said I can maintain the machine and the related code. I'll gladly help Eduardo with reviews or have a tree ready for machine/qd= ev and send pull requests if Peter agrees to it. Eduardo, Peter what is your take on this? Thanks, Marcel > > For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM > migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up > you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so tha= t > at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring > discussion? > > Regards, > Andreas >