From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:00:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from [IPv6:::ffff:207.16.149.110] ([IPv6:::ffff:207.16.149.110]:9405 "EHLO mail.teralogic.tv") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 19:00:36 +0100 Received: from tlexmail.teralogic.tv (tlexmail [192.168.100.138]) by mail.teralogic.tv (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3HHvAO22987 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by TLEXMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <22ACPB06>; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:53:57 -0700 Message-ID: <56BEF0DBC8B9D611BFDB00508B5E2634102F10@TLEXMAIL> From: Dennis Castleman To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:53:57 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C3050A.51918910" Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 2099 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: DennisCastleman@oaktech.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3050A.51918910 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" ALL Anybody know the performance differences I can expect using a MIPS 5K core @250 Mhz in 64bit mode versus 32bit mode? Dennis ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3050A.51918910 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

ALL

Anybody know the performance = differences I can expect using a MIPS 5K core @250 Mhz in 64bit mode = versus 32bit mode?

Dennis=20

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3050A.51918910--