All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@bitdefender.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] xen/vm-events: Move parts of monitor_domctl code to common-side.
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:42:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C1C7CE.6000000@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1602151224140.27008@kaball.uk.xensource.com>

On 2/15/2016 2:25 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 15.02.16 at 07:37, <czuzu@bitdefender.com> wrote:
>>>       default:
>>> -        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +        /*
>>> +         * Should not be reached unless arch_monitor_get_capabilities() is not
>>> +         * properly implemented. In that case, since reaching this point does
>>> +         * not really break anything, don't crash the hypervisor, issue a
>>> +         * warning instead of BUG().
>>> +         */
>>> +        printk(XENLOG_WARNING
>>> +                "WARNING, BUG: arch_monitor_get_capabilities() not implemented"
>>> +                "properly.\n");
>>>   
>>> -    };
>>> +        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +    }
>> I disagree with the issuing of a message here. At the very least this
>> should be a dprintk(). Perhaps an ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() would be
>> the way to go? What's worse though is that I can't see the checking
>> which would make true the "should not be reached" statement above
>> (not that you must not rely on the caller of the hypercall to be well
>> behaved).
> ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() is appropriate here
>

Noted.

Corneliu.

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-15 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-15  6:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] Vm-events: move monitor vm-events code to common-side Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15  6:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] xen/x86: merge 2 hvm_event_... functions into 1 Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15  8:30   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-02-15 17:40     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 17:47       ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-02-15 17:54         ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 18:10           ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-02-15  6:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] xen/vm-events: Move parts of monitor_domctl code to common-side Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15  8:46   ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 11:41   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 12:14     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 12:44       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 13:29         ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 14:08           ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 16:15             ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-02-15 16:28             ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 16:44               ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 16:51                 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-02-15 16:59                   ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 12:21     ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 12:25     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-02-15 12:42       ` Corneliu ZUZU [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C1C7CE.6000000@bitdefender.com \
    --to=czuzu@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=tamas@tklengyel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.