From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] x86/hvm: Collect information of TSC scaling ratio Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:10:07 -0700 Message-ID: <56CC764F02000078000D53C9@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> References: <1456193104-12761-1-git-send-email-haozhong.zhang@intel.com> <1456193104-12761-2-git-send-email-haozhong.zhang@intel.com> <56CC65F4.4070803@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56CC65F4.4070803@oracle.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Haozhong Zhang , Boris Ostrovsky Cc: Kevin Tian , Keir Fraser , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Andrew Cooper , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Aravind Gopalakrishnan , Jun Nakajima List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 23.02.16 at 15:00, wrote: > On 02/22/2016 09:04 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote: > >> >> + if ( cpu_has_tsc_ratio ) >> + svm_function_table.tsc_scaling.ratio_frac_bits = 32; >> + > > >> >> +#define hvm_tsc_scaling_supported \ >> + (!!hvm_funcs.tsc_scaling.ratio_frac_bits) >> + > > What is the difference (in usage) between cpu_has_tsc_ratio and > hvm_tsc_scaling_supported? Isn't the first imply the second (and if yes > then what's the reason for having the latter)? Iiuc cpu_has_tsc_ratio is AMD/SVM specific, while hvm_tsc_scaling_supported is meant to be vendor independent. Jan