From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail5.wrs.com (mail5.windriver.com [192.103.53.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EE57570D for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 01:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail5.wrs.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u211XOYU030518 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:33:24 -0800 Received: from soho-mhatle-m.local (172.25.36.235) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:33:24 -0800 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <56D12579.9020705@windriver.com> <56D23094.20207@windriver.com> <56D46567.7070409@windriver.com> From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems Message-ID: <56D4F163.8060406@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:33:23 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56D46567.7070409@windriver.com> Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] Upgrade RPM 5 to 5.4.16 (CVS HEAD) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 01:33:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/29/16 9:36 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: > Status update. Further status, I've identified all of the pending issues and will have a v3 patch sent out likely in the next few hours. I just have to let my local tests finish. --Mark > I was able to reproduce the issue and I have added a configure check to see if > the compiler supports the atomic operations or not. RPM will then configure > itself to use them if available. > > I also disabled the blake tests which were causing issues in some parallel builds. > > Finally I found an issue where a specific dependency (internal to the package) > was not being properly determined by RPM. I'm currently investigating this. > > --Mark > > On 2/27/16 5:26 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> On 2/27/16 4:47 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: >>> >>> On 27 February 2016 at 04:26, Mark Hatle >> > wrote: >>> >>> I am not getting this error on qemux86. >>> >>> My build configuration: >>> >>> BB_VERSION = "1.29.0" >>> BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" >>> NATIVELSBSTRING = "Fedora-23" >>> TARGET_SYS = "i586-oe-linux" >>> MACHINE = "qemux86" >>> DISTRO = "nodistro" >>> DISTRO_VERSION = "nodistro.0" >>> TUNE_FEATURES = "m32 i586" >>> TARGET_FPU = "" >>> meta = "mhatle/rpm-5.4.16:004efb3aaa973dba030847c1c8218238f0cc68c5" >>> >>> The local.conf is the stock one with buildhistory and package_rpm enabled. >>> >>> Which compiler do you have enabled? I'm building with the default 5.3.0 >>> compiler. >>> >>> Since I'm not reproducing the problem, I'd like to know what the difference in >>> configurations is. >>> >>> >>> This was on the autobuilder and happened twice in rpm-native: >>> >>> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/38006/ (Debian 8.3) >>> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/38000/ (Ubuntu 14.04) >>> >>> I guess the -native bit is important there. >> >> Ok.. so that is different. It means the host compiler is too old and doesn't >> support atomic transactions. >> >>> Also, another failure happened more globally: >>> >>> gcc: error: tblake2bp.o: No such file or directory >>> >>> Several times in rpm for target: >>> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/37991/ >>> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/38001/ >>> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/38007/ >>> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/38004/ >> >> Ok. I'll investigate this one as well. Likely this is a parallel build issue, >> hopefully I can spot the fault. >> >> --Mark >> >>> And once in rpm-native: >>> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/37995/ >>> >>> Ross >> >