From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 00/10] Add generic PM domain support for Tegra Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:47:58 +0000 Message-ID: <56D8246E.5090909@nvidia.com> References: <1456501724-28477-1-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com> <20160302153556.GB21035@ulmo.nvidia.com> <7h7fhk3c4o.fsf@baylibre.com> <7h7fhkxn1r.fsf@baylibre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7h7fhkxn1r.fsf-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Kevin Hilman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Thierry Reding , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Stephen Warren , Alexandre Courbot , Ulf Hansson , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 03/03/16 03:22, Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>> Thierry Reding writes: >>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:48:34PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: >>>>> Adds generic PM domain support for Tegra SoCs but this series only >>>>> enables support for it on Tegra 64-bit devices. There is no reason why >>>>> this cannot be enable for Tegra 32-bit devices, but to keep the patch >>>>> series to a minimum only 64-bit devices are enabled so far. >>>>> >>>>> This series has been boot tested on Tegra210 as well as various 32-bit >>>>> Tegra platforms. >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>> Jon Hunter (10): >>>>> PM / Domains: Fix removal of a subdomain >>>>> PM / Domains: Add function to get the last domain added >>>>> PM / Domains: Add function to remove a pm-domain >>>> >>>> Ulf, Kevin, Rafael, >>>> >>>> It's too late to take these patches through the Tegra tree for v4.6, but >>>> if Jon can get the above three patches ready before the merge window, >>>> would you be willing to pick them up into your trees for v4.6? >>> >>> It's a bit late in the cycle, but since one is a fix and the other two >>> add functions that aren't (yet) used, I think it would be fine to get >>> them in for v4.6. But, the final decision is with Rafael. >>> >>>> Doing so >>>> might make it easier to deal with the dependencies. The prerequisites >>>> would already be in Linus' tree when I apply the Tegra bits for v4.7. >>> >>> Yeah, makes sense. >>> >>>> I don't mind taking all of it through the Tegra tree for v4.7, though. I >>>> can provide a stable branch with the PM / Domains patches for you to >>>> pull in, in case there are any conflicts. >>> >>> I think it makes the most sense for these prereqs to merge through >>> linux-pm. Let's see what Rafael thinks about the timing. >> >> The timing is fine by me. >> >> Do you want me to apply [1-3/10] from this series, then? > > Jon has some minor tweaks to do, so he'll respin and then you can take > them. > > Jon, feel free to add: > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman > > For those as well. I thought I responded, but looks like I didn't. I am preparing a V7 that I will send out today/tomorrow (latest). I am going to drop the removal parts for now and send that out separately as an RFC because it is bigger than I have expected. Cheers Jon