All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>,
	Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] slow data path communication between DPDK port and Linux
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 08:19:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E91720.5070607@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E90A9F.4020608@redhat.com>

On 3/16/2016 7:26 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 03/14/2016 05:32 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 3/9/2016 11:17 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>> This patch sent to keep record of latest status of the work.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is slow data path communication implementation based on existing KNI.
>>>
>>> Difference is: librte_kni converted into a PMD, kdp kernel module is almost
>>> same except all control path functionality removed and some simplification done.
>>>
>>> Motivation is to simplify slow path data communication.
>>> Now any application can use this new PMD to send/get data to Linux kernel.
>>>
>>> PMD supports two communication methods:
>>>
>>> 1) KDP kernel module
>>> PMD initialization functions handles creating virtual interfaces (with help of
>>> kdp kernel module) and created FIFO. FIFO is used to share data between
>>> userspace and kernelspace. This is default method.
>>>
>>> 2) tun/tap module
>>> When KDP module is not inserted, PMD creates tap interface and transfers
>>> packets using tap interface.
>>>
>>> In long term this patch intends to replace the KNI and KNI will be
>>> depreciated.
>>>
>>
>> Self-NACK: Will work on another option that does not introduce new
>> kernel module.
>>
> 
> Hmm, care to elaborate a bit? The second mode of this PMD already was 
> free of external kernel modules. Do you mean you'll be just removing 
> mode 1) from the PMD or looking at something completely different?
> 
> Just thinking that tun/tap PMD sounds like a useful thing to have, I 
> hope you're not abandoning that.
> 

It will be KNI PMD.
Plan is to have something like KDP, but with existing KNI kernel module.
There will be tun/tap support as fallback.

Regards,
ferruh

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-16  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-27 16:32 [PATCH 0/2] slow data path communication between DPDK port and Linux Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-27 16:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] kdp: add kernel data path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-08 17:14   ` Reshma Pattan
2016-02-09 10:53     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-27 16:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] kdp: add virtual PMD for kernel slow data path communication Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-28  8:16   ` Xu, Qian Q
2016-01-29 16:04     ` Yigit, Ferruh
2016-02-09 17:33   ` Reshma Pattan
2016-02-09 17:51     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-19  5:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] slow data path communication between DPDK port and Linux Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-19  5:05   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kdp: add kernel data path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-19  5:05   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kdp: add virtual PMD for kernel slow data path communication Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:17   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] slow data path communication between DPDK port and Linux Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:17     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] kdp: add kernel data path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:17     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] kdp: add virtual PMD for kernel slow data path communication Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-14 15:32     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] slow data path communication between DPDK port and Linux Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-16  7:26       ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-16  8:19         ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2016-03-16  8:22           ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-16 10:26             ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-16 10:45               ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-16 11:07                 ` Mcnamara, John
2016-03-16 11:13                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-16 13:23                   ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-16 13:15               ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-16 13:58                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-16 15:03                   ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-16 15:15                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-16 11:07             ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E91720.5070607@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.