From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933383AbcCRPze (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:55:34 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56797 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932266AbcCRPzb (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:55:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC5 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64 To: Yury Norov , "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" References: <1452792198-10718-1-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> <56AB3805.1040308@huawei.com> <20160129170929.GA3543@yury-N73SV> <56AC38F1.2030608@huawei.com> <20160218223506.GA7816@yury-N73SV> <20160225202855.GD16123@yury-N73SV> <56EBD84D.2060009@huawei.com> <20160318154918.GA1595@yury-N73SV> Cc: Andreas Schwab , arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pinskia@gmail.com, Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, broonie@kernel.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, klimov.linux@gmail.com, jan.dakinevich@gmail.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com, joseph@codesourcery.com, christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com, Bamvor Zhang Jian From: Alexander Graf Message-ID: <56EC24EE.6020803@suse.de> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:55:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160318154918.GA1595@yury-N73SV> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18.03.16 16:49, Yury Norov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:28:29PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote: >> >> For the glibc part, I found that there are 11 patches of ilp32 in top, >> but the original 28 patches of ilp32 is not in the top, there are more >> than 900 patches between them(referece the list below). Are you >> willing rebase all the ilp32 relative patches. It is very useful for >> reviewing and debugging. I saw andrew request the account in glibc, >> maybe it has already been in processs?). >> > > I already told there's mess there, and I'd prefer to make things work > first and then do cleanup. So how is progress going overall? The last submission I've seen is already 2 months ago. Are there particular bits holding you up? Alex From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: agraf@suse.de (Alexander Graf) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:55:26 +0100 Subject: [RFC5 PATCH v6 00/21] ILP32 for ARM64 In-Reply-To: <20160318154918.GA1595@yury-N73SV> References: <1452792198-10718-1-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> <56AB3805.1040308@huawei.com> <20160129170929.GA3543@yury-N73SV> <56AC38F1.2030608@huawei.com> <20160218223506.GA7816@yury-N73SV> <20160225202855.GD16123@yury-N73SV> <56EBD84D.2060009@huawei.com> <20160318154918.GA1595@yury-N73SV> Message-ID: <56EC24EE.6020803@suse.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 18.03.16 16:49, Yury Norov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:28:29PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote: >> >> For the glibc part, I found that there are 11 patches of ilp32 in top, >> but the original 28 patches of ilp32 is not in the top, there are more >> than 900 patches between them(referece the list below). Are you >> willing rebase all the ilp32 relative patches. It is very useful for >> reviewing and debugging. I saw andrew request the account in glibc, >> maybe it has already been in processs?). >> > > I already told there's mess there, and I'd prefer to make things work > first and then do cleanup. So how is progress going overall? The last submission I've seen is already 2 months ago. Are there particular bits holding you up? Alex