All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhangjian (Bamvor) <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH V3 RESEND 0/5] Add ILP32 support in aarch64
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:10:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EEA12F.3040400@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B26D0A.3000906@gmail.com>

Hi, Romain, Arnout, all

On 2016/2/4 5:11, Romain Naour wrote:
> Hello Bamvor, All,
>
> Le 02/02/2016 12:16, Arnout Vandecappelle a ?crit :
>> On 02-02-16 11:49, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote:
>>> Hi, Romain
>>>
>>> On 2016/2/2 17:04, Romain Naour wrote:
>>>> Hi Bamvor,
>>>>
>>>> Le 02/02/2016 03:29, Zhangjian (Bamvor) a ?crit :
>> [snip]
>>>>> You could this glibc[1]. IIRC, It is for patch v6 rfc2. We are planning to
>>>>> update it for patch v6 rfc5.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for this link.
>
> The git tree from github doesn't build:
>
> ../sysdeps/aarch64/multiarch/memset.c: In function '__libc_memset_ifunc':
> ../sysdeps/aarch64/multiarch/memset.c:35:1: error: implicit declaration of
> function '__getauxval' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> libc_ifunc (__libc_memset,
>
>>>>
>>>> To be honest, I don't think this series will be merged as is until a stable
>>>> toolchain release is made.
>>> What's your mean stable toolchain? A toolchain release from a organization or
>>> company?
>>
>>   It means a release made by someone, not a random version from a git tree
>> somewhere. Basically something where people know where to send bug reports to.
>> This indeed usually means it's done by an organisation.
>
> At the beginning of this review I expected that it was easy to rebuild an IPL32
> toolchain using the abe script, but it's not the case.
>
>>
>>
>>> Do you think it will be accepted after patch of ilp32 of kernel and glibc
>>> upstream?
>>
>>   It doesn't necessarily mean that upstream has to have accepted it already. We
>> just prefer to have a release tarball.
>
> See as example the toolchains provided by Imagination Technologies [1] or
> Synopsys [2]. All their patches they are using may not upstream yet, but they
> provide a working toolchain which is pretty well tested.
>
> [1] http://codescape-mips-sdk.imgtec.com/components/toolchain/2015.06-05/
> [2] https://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/toolchain/releases/
In recent linaro connect, there is a presentation[1] about the performance of ilp32.
And in its homepage[2], there is a script[3] for building the ilp32 compiler.
At this pointer, are you intertested in review the patches of ilp32 if I send a new
series?

Regards

Bamvor

[1] http://connect.linaro.org/resource/bkk16/bkk16-305b/
[2] https://wiki.leapproject.ca/index.php?title=AArch64_ILP32_Toolchain
[3] https://github.com/leapproject/ilp32-toolchain/blob/master/build_ilp32_toolchain.sh

>
>>
>>   Regards,
>>   Arnout
>>
>>> I am trying to improve the glibc support for ilp32 base on the exist one
>
> I understand, that's great.
>
> Best regards,
> Romain
>
>>
>>>> When it's done, can you respin your series on top of
>>>> master since the toolchain-external code has been updated recently ?
>>> Yes, of course.
>>>
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-20 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-13  1:16 [Buildroot] [PATCH V3 RESEND 0/5] Add ILP32 support in aarch64 Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-08-13  1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH V3 RESEND 1/5] aarch64: align aarch64_be config with aarch64s' Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-08-13  1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH V3 RESEND 2/5] aarch64: ilp32: handle special file name Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-08-13  1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH V3 RESEND 3/5] aarch64: ilp32: add ilp32 compiler and linker flags Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-08-13  1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH V3 RESEND 4/5] aarch64: ilp32: add ilp32 build config Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-08-13  1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH V3 RESEND 5/5] aarch64: ilp32 defconfig examples Bamvor Jian Zhang
2016-01-16 15:25 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH V3 RESEND 0/5] Add ILP32 support in aarch64 Romain Naour
2016-01-19  4:00   ` Bamvor Zhang Jian
2016-01-20 21:26     ` Romain Naour
2016-01-21  9:03       ` Bamvor Zhang Jian
2016-01-24 11:35         ` Romain Naour
2016-02-02  2:29           ` Zhangjian
2016-02-02  9:04             ` Romain Naour
2016-02-02 10:49               ` Zhangjian
2016-02-02 11:16                 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-02-03 21:11                   ` Romain Naour
2016-03-20 13:10                     ` Zhangjian [this message]
2016-03-20 20:33                       ` Romain Naour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56EEA12F.3040400@huawei.com \
    --to=bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.