From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Roese Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:52:18 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] i2c: designware_i2c: Add support for PCI(e) based I2C cores (x86) In-Reply-To: References: <1458287661-21745-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <1458287661-21745-6-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <56EFB8D2.5030306@denx.de> <56EFE346.4030008@denx.de> Message-ID: <56EFEE82.5020903@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Bin, On 21.03.2016 13:43, Bin Meng wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Stefan Roese wrote: >> Hi Bin, >> >> On 21.03.2016 10:03, Stefan Roese wrote: >> >> >> >>>>> static int designware_i2c_probe_chip(struct udevice *bus, uint chip_addr, >>>>> @@ -476,14 +519,45 @@ static int designware_i2c_probe(struct udevice *bus) >>>>> { >>>>> struct dw_i2c *priv = dev_get_priv(bus); >>>>> >>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 >>>>> + /* Save base address from PCI BAR */ >>>>> + priv->regs = (struct i2c_regs *) >>>>> + dm_pci_map_bar(bus, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, PCI_REGION_MEM); >>>>> + /* Use BayTrail specific timing values */ >>>>> + priv->scl_sda_cfg = &byt_config; >>>>> +#else >>>> >>>> How about: >>>> >>>> if (device_is_on_pci_bus(dev)) { >>>> do the PCI I2C stuff here; >>>> } >>> >>> I've tried this but it generated compilation errors on socfpga, as the >>> dm_pci_xxx functions are not available there. So it definitely needs >>> some #ifdef here. I could go with your suggestion and use >>> #if CONFIG_DM_PCI as well. >>> >>>> See driver/net/designware.c for example. >>>> >>>>> /* Save base address from device-tree */ >>>>> priv->regs = (struct i2c_regs *)dev_get_addr(bus); >>>>> +#endif >> >> Enabling this code for x86 via if (device_is_on_pci_bus(dev)) results >> in this ugly compilation warning: >> >> drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c: In function ?designware_i2c_probe?: >> drivers/i2c/designware_i2c.c:530:16: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast] >> priv->regs = (struct i2c_regs *)dev_get_addr(bus); >> ^ >> >> This is because x86 defines fdt_addr_t / phys_addr_t as 64bit. So >> I'm wondering, how dev_get_addr() should get used on x86. Has it >> been used anywhere here at all? Should we perhaps go back to >> a 32bit phy_addr representation again? So that dev_get_addr() >> matches the (void *) size again? >> > > dev_get_addr() is being used on x86 drivers. See > ns16550_serial_ofdata_to_platdata() for example. There is no build > warning for the ns16550 driver. I see, thanks. Its used differently there though. Let me see, if I cook something up... Thanks, Stefan