From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751693AbcC2IXY (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 04:23:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:33590 "EHLO mail-pf0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751082AbcC2IXU (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 04:23:20 -0400 Message-ID: <56FA3B70.2090902@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:23:12 +0800 From: zhangfei User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn Lin , Guodong Xu , Shawn Lin CC: robh+dt@kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIE1vbGw=?= , Mark Rutland , ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, Kumar Gala , jh80.chung@samsung.com, Ulf Hansson , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Kong Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: add resets support to dw_mmc References: <1457254062-22677-1-git-send-email-guodong.xu@linaro.org> <1457254062-22677-2-git-send-email-guodong.xu@linaro.org> <56DC3BAD.8020107@rock-chips.com> <56F9E6E5.9000100@kernel-upstream.org> In-Reply-To: <56F9E6E5.9000100@kernel-upstream.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/29/2016 10:22 AM, Shawn Lin wrote: >> >> >> >> + else if (IS_ERR(host->pdata)) { >> dev_err(host->dev, "platform data not >> available\n"); >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> @@ -3012,6 +3022,9 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host) >> } >> } >> >> + if (host->pdata->rstc != NULL) >> + reset_control_deassert(host->pdata->rstc); >> + >> >> >> sorry, I can't follow your intention here. Shouldn't it be something >> like "assert mmc -> may need delay -> deassert mmc". As your current >> code, nothing happend right? Should be abstracted in reset driver. >> >> >> The chip exits from bootloader with this bit asserted. And when entering >> kernel, we only need to deassert. >> >> In my current code, the driver deassert mmc in _probe(), and assert mmc >> in _remove(). > > I catch your point. From the previous discussion, we add it to make sure > dw_mmc in good state after leaving bootloader to kernel. But My real > question is that you can assert it in bootloader, so you can also > dessert it in bootloaer to make sure dw_mmc work fine when probing > in kernel. In that way, we don't need this patch? uefi does not have exit point, and kernel may not assume mmc controller state is always correct when boot. If Uefi need copy Image from mmc, mmc controller is in working state. When jump to kernel, uefi mmc driver can not recover itself. If kernel assume mmc controller state is clean, mmc will be in abnormal state. Some controller will clear itself when set clock, however, hip660 does not, it need special register to access. > > More to think, Is it ok to match the behaviour of bootloader stage? > My bootloader doesn't assert the reset pin of dw_mmc, so it seams if > I want to fix you issue on kernel stage, I need a new round of > assert->delay->deassert. The process like delay (if required) should be abstracted in reset driver. reset framework just export reset_control_assert/reset_control_deassert API. Unfortunately not find clear description in Documentation/. Suppose deassert is like start, while assert is like stop. drivers/reset/core.c reset_control_deassert - deasserts the reset line reset_control_assert - asserts the reset line More example: drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-st.c drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c drivers/usb/host/ohci-platform.c drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c Thanks