From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 13:35:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early Message-Id: <57011C30.7020805@cogentembedded.com> List-Id: References: <1447948611-2615-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <1447948611-2615-10-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <56FD9080.4090203@cogentembedded.com> <20160331224838.GA7381@katana> <56FED245.4010503@cogentembedded.com> <20160401201415.GA25936@katana> <56FEFEC4.6010401@cogentembedded.com> <20160402072726.GA1384@katana> <56FFC06F.70108@cogentembedded.com> <20160403082513.GA1404@katana> In-Reply-To: <20160403082513.GA1404@katana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Simon Horman , Laurent Pinchart , Geert Uytterhoeven , Kuninori Morimoto , Yoshihiro Shimoda , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org" On 04/03/2016 11:25 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> And I still don't feel good about the patch removing the spinlock -- I'm >> not sure it's SMP-safe... > > In what scenario? I've reviewed the patches once again and it looked like they are safe. MBR, Sergei From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: rcar: revoke START request early Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 16:35:44 +0300 Message-ID: <57011C30.7020805@cogentembedded.com> References: <1447948611-2615-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <1447948611-2615-10-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <56FD9080.4090203@cogentembedded.com> <20160331224838.GA7381@katana> <56FED245.4010503@cogentembedded.com> <20160401201415.GA25936@katana> <56FEFEC4.6010401@cogentembedded.com> <20160402072726.GA1384@katana> <56FFC06F.70108@cogentembedded.com> <20160403082513.GA1404@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160403082513.GA1404@katana> Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Simon Horman , Laurent Pinchart , Geert Uytterhoeven , Kuninori Morimoto , Yoshihiro Shimoda , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 04/03/2016 11:25 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> And I still don't feel good about the patch removing the spinlock -- I'm >> not sure it's SMP-safe... > > In what scenario? I've reviewed the patches once again and it looked like they are safe. MBR, Sergei