Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] bpf: add PHYS_DEV prog type for early driver filter

[Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>]

On 16-04-09 01:26 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:

>
> yeah, no stack, no queues in bpf.

Thanks.

>
>> If this is _forwarding only_ it maybe useful to look at
>> Alexey's old code in particular the DMA bits;
>> he built his own lookup algorithm but sounds like bpf is
>> a much better fit today.
>
> a link to these old bits?
>

Dang. Trying to remember exact name (I think it has been gone for at
least 10 years now). I know it is not CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE although
it could have been that depending on the driver (tulip had some
nice DMA properties - which by todays standards would be considered
primitive ;->).
+Cc Robert and Alexey (Trying to figure out name of driver based
routing code that DMAed from ingress to egress port)

> Just to be clear: this rfc is not the only thing we're considering.
> In particular huawei guys did a monster effort to improve performance
> in this area as well. We'll try to blend all the code together and
> pick what's the best.
>

Sounds very interesting.

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>