From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] hwmon: (it87) Various enhancements and fixes To: Jean Delvare References: <1453860229-23614-1-git-send-email-patchwork@patchwork.roeck-us.net> <57091AAF.7030900@roeck-us.net> <20160412092125.17ab498c@endymion> Cc: Martin Blumenstingl , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <570CF43E.5050500@roeck-us.net> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 06:12:30 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160412092125.17ab498c@endymion> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: On 04/12/2016 12:21 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 08:07:27 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> On 04/09/2016 02:33 AM, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: >>> Guenter Roeck patchwork.roeck-us.net> writes: >>>> From: Guenter Roeck roeck-us.net> >>>> >>>> This patch series builds on top of v4.5-rc1. The series was tested on >>>> a system with IT8728F. Out-of-kernel versions were tested by various >>>> people using a github repository. >>> I've been running the whole series on top of v4.5 for the past two >>> weeks on a system with IT8628E. I did not find any problems so far. >> >> thanks a lot for the feedback. It would be great if you can send me >> an official Tested-by: that I can add into the series (or a permission >> to do so). >> >> With the experience gained with the off-list driver, I think this series >> is good to go for upstream, even without code review feedback. Otherwise >> I fear we'll never get there. Jean, any objections ? > > I am sorry that I do not have the time to review this patch series. But > I trust your judgment and I have no objection, if you think the series > is good to go upstream then please push it there. > No need to be sorry. We are all busy. Thanks! Guenter