From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C494762CD for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2015 12:03:40 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,578,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="774726720" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.23.219.25]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2015 12:03:40 -0700 Received: by linux.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id 309A46A4087; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:02:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 10.252.34.83 (SquirrelMail authenticated user alexander.kanavin) by linux.intel.com with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 22:02:54 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <57131.10.252.34.83.1438282974.squirrel@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 22:02:54 +0300 (EEST) From: alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com To: "Paul Eggleton" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el4.centos.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: <20150730144327.GL2457@jama> <55BA4327.1050406@linux.intel.com> <3191513.j5SDqNSYIE@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <3191513.j5SDqNSYIE@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] webkitgtk: add a new recipe for latest upstream version X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:03:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > I have to say I think it would be simpler not to rename it, FWIW... Why? Not renaming the recipe buys you nothing; the new webkit has a new API, so for anyone out there using the old webkit things will break regardless of whether the recipe has been renamed or not. Alex