From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtY7W-0004Lq-UJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:29:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtXub-0005YU-H4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:15:46 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:45836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtXua-0005D0-LG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:15:45 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id w17so2597064wrn.12 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:15:39 -0800 (PST) References: <20190204142638.27021-1-mst@redhat.com> <20190204205105-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20190205110518-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20190212071114.GM1011@xz-x1> <20190212080349-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <5716364b-da70-e134-4ed0-d3d136d9ba8a@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:15:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190212080349-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/25] pci, pc, virtio: fixes, cleanups, features List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Peter Xu , Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers , Changpeng Liu , Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefano Garzarella On 2/12/19 2:04 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:39:21AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> On 2/12/19 8:11 AM, Peter Xu wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:06:42AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> >>>> OK I reverted the whole part dealing with vhost-user and reposted. >>> >>> I noticed that the merged pull request could possibly have squashed >>> the below two patches (in previous pull) into one super patch >>> (a56de056c91f87e1e): >>> >>> i386/kvm: ignore masked irqs when update msi routes >>> contrib/vhost-user-blk: fix the compilation issue >>> >>> Here, the first patch lost its commit message, and the last patch lost >>> its real author. ;) >> >> I suggest we revert a56de056c9 ASAP and reapply the both patches, this >> will ease cherry-picking/downstream workflow. > > I don't see why does it help upstream. I'd have suggested the same if I had no idea what 'downstream workflow' mean, simply to keep the tree clear and avoid to have unrelated changes squashed altogether. Commit a56de056c9 really looks messy. MSI/MSIX changes described by "fix vhost-user-blk compilation". Hopefully it won't trigger any problem which requires bisecting to it, then contact Changpeng Liu asking him what he intented to do with his commit. Your call anyway :) Regards, Phil.