From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752065AbcDUIkT (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:40:19 -0400
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:5645 "EHLO
	szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751970AbcDUIkR (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 21 Apr 2016 04:40:17 -0400
Message-ID: <571891E0.60703@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:40:00 +0800
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC: Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>, <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        <dingxiang@huawei.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A mainline question about cgroup writeback
References: <5715DC1F.2020803@huawei.com> <20160420212251.GF4775@htj.duckdns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160420212251.GF4775@htj.duckdns.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.177.29.68]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0),
	refid=str=0001.0A0B0203.571891EC.01FE,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0,
	ip=0.0.0.0,
	so=2013-05-26 15:14:31,
	dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 33f45daa3c2d4d56e5f6703762bda5b9
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 2016/4/21 5:22, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:19:59PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>> cgroup writeback support the filesystem both ext4 and ext2.
>> but,  it appears to be not work when I test the function in the ext4.
>> The example is as follows:
>> echo "8:0 1048576" > blkio.throttle.write_bps_device
>> echo $$ > cgroup.procs
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/test.c bs=1M count=10240
>> 10240+0 records in
>> 10240+0 records out
>> 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 49.8796 s, 215 MB/s
> How much memory does the cgroup have available to it?  It's buffered
> write.  It might not get throttled if there are enough pages to dirty.
>
> Thanks.
>
  Maybe it's my fault.  I just limit two fields in dirty_background_bytes and dirty_bytes , 
  and I don't consider about  the available memory in the cgroup.


 Thanks
 zhongjiang