From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] drivers/net: add 6WIND SHULTI support Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:48:17 +0200 Message-ID: <57231FD1.2080907@6wind.com> References: <20160427151336.GB1962@nanopsycho.orion> <20160427.125506.1088576804354580011.davem@davemloft.net> <5721FB26.6070305@6wind.com> <20160428.115419.1831238411921569629.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, fw@strlen.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:35698 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750925AbcD2IsV (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 04:48:21 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id e201so18567604wme.0 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 01:48:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160428.115419.1831238411921569629.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 28/04/2016 17:54, David Miller a =E9crit : [snip] > You can say whatever you want, but the facilities you are adding to > this driver enables proprietary userland SDK components. >=20 > And this is precisely what we are trying to avoid by having a clean, > fully featured switch device model in the kernel. >=20 > It is against your interestes of upstreaming your driver to continue > denying what your changes facilitate. Ok, I will rework this patch to remove the controversial parts and cust= om APIs. Thank you, Nicolas