Re: [PATCH v2 1/2][UPDATE] PM / OPP: add non-OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table

[Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>]

On 29/04/16 10:28, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This isn't V2, but V3
>
> On 29-04-16, 10:22, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Functions dev_pm_opp_of_{cpumask_,}remove_table removes/frees all the
>> static OPP entries associated with the device and/or all cpus(in case
>> of cpumask) that are created from DT.
>>
>> However the OPP entries are populated reading from the firmware or some
>> different method using dev_pm_opp_add are marked dynamic and can't be
>> removed using above functions.
>>
>> This patch adds non DT/OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table
>> to support the above mentioned usecase.
>>
>> This is in preparation to make use of the same in scpi-cpufreq.c
>>
>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/base/power/opp/core.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>   drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c  | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>   include/linux/pm_opp.h        | 10 ++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> 	- Instead of renaming OF versions, created non-OF versions of
>> 	  dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table as suggested by Viresh
>>
>
> You should have added v2->v3 here
>

No, thought I will post v3 of both the patches with your ACK so that
it's easy for Rafael to pick up if he has no comments :)

>> This version also updates all the errors in documentation and changes
>> to use remove_all rather than remove_dyn.
>
> But all that isn't going to be part of the history, so it should be fine :)
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>

Thanks

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep