From: "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com> To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <Will.Deacon@arm.com>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <jason@lakedaemon.net>, <lizefan@huawei.com>, <huxinwei@huawei.com>, <dingtianhong@huawei.com>, <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>, <zhaojunhua@hisilicon.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] irqchip/mbigen: fix the IO remap problem in mbigen driver. Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 17:07:16 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <572C5EC4.4010204@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <572C4883.20106@arm.com> Hi Marc: 在 2016/5/6 15:32, Marc Zyngier 写道: > On 06/05/16 02:12, majun (F) wrote: >> Hi Marc: >> >> 在 2016/5/5 22:49, Marc Zyngier 写道: >>> On 22/03/16 03:10, majun (F) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> 在 2016/3/21 18:29, Thomas Gleixner 写道: >>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, MaJun wrote: >>>>>> This patch set is used to fix the problem of remap a set of registers >>>>>> repeatedly in current mbigen driver. >>>>>> >>>>>> irqchip/mbigen:Change the mbigen node definition in dt binding file >>>>>> irqchip/mbigen:Change the mbigen driver based on the new mbigen node definition >>>>> >>>>> These subject lines are still horrible as they tell nothing about the nature >>>>> of the change. I fixed them up along with the changelogs and applied them to >>>>> irq/urgent. Can you spot the difference? >>>> >>>> Yes, after you changing, the subject and change log clearly show why we need to >>>> do this change. >>>> I have learned a lot from you :) >>>> >>>>> >>>>> While at it. The config switch for this driver is horrible. It's just in the >>>>> middle of the device driver configs. Why is this configurable by the user at >>>>> all? It simply should be selected by arm64 or some subarch configuration >>>>> there. Please clean that up. >>>>> >>>> will do. >>> >>> So what's the status of this? Do you still plan to respin it? >>> >> >> This patch set had been ACK by Thomas. > > Interesting. Somehow, the ARM email server has decided not to deliver > the tip-bot messages, so I didn't see it was already in. > > Sorry for the noise. Not at all. Thank you for your attention. MaJun Thanks! > > M. >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: majun258@huawei.com (majun (F)) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] irqchip/mbigen: fix the IO remap problem in mbigen driver. Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 17:07:16 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <572C5EC4.4010204@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <572C4883.20106@arm.com> Hi Marc: ? 2016/5/6 15:32, Marc Zyngier ??: > On 06/05/16 02:12, majun (F) wrote: >> Hi Marc: >> >> ? 2016/5/5 22:49, Marc Zyngier ??: >>> On 22/03/16 03:10, majun (F) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> ? 2016/3/21 18:29, Thomas Gleixner ??: >>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, MaJun wrote: >>>>>> This patch set is used to fix the problem of remap a set of registers >>>>>> repeatedly in current mbigen driver. >>>>>> >>>>>> irqchip/mbigen:Change the mbigen node definition in dt binding file >>>>>> irqchip/mbigen:Change the mbigen driver based on the new mbigen node definition >>>>> >>>>> These subject lines are still horrible as they tell nothing about the nature >>>>> of the change. I fixed them up along with the changelogs and applied them to >>>>> irq/urgent. Can you spot the difference? >>>> >>>> Yes, after you changing, the subject and change log clearly show why we need to >>>> do this change. >>>> I have learned a lot from you :) >>>> >>>>> >>>>> While at it. The config switch for this driver is horrible. It's just in the >>>>> middle of the device driver configs. Why is this configurable by the user at >>>>> all? It simply should be selected by arm64 or some subarch configuration >>>>> there. Please clean that up. >>>>> >>>> will do. >>> >>> So what's the status of this? Do you still plan to respin it? >>> >> >> This patch set had been ACK by Thomas. > > Interesting. Somehow, the ARM email server has decided not to deliver > the tip-bot messages, so I didn't see it was already in. > > Sorry for the noise. Not at all. Thank you for your attention. MaJun Thanks! > > M. >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-06 9:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-03-17 8:33 [PATCH v3 0/2] irqchip/mbigen: fix the IO remap problem in mbigen driver MaJun 2016-03-17 8:33 ` MaJun 2016-03-17 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] irqchip/mbigen:Change the mbigen node definition in dt binding file MaJun 2016-03-17 8:34 ` MaJun 2016-03-21 10:30 ` [tip:irq/urgent] irqchip/mbigen: Adjust DT bindings to handle multiple devices in a module tip-bot for MaJun 2016-03-17 8:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] irqchip/mbigen:Change the mbigen driver based on the new mbigen node definition MaJun 2016-03-17 8:34 ` MaJun 2016-03-21 10:30 ` [tip:irq/urgent] irqchip/mbigen: Handle multiple device nodes in a mbigen module tip-bot for MaJun 2016-03-21 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] irqchip/mbigen: fix the IO remap problem in mbigen driver Thomas Gleixner 2016-03-21 10:29 ` Thomas Gleixner 2016-03-22 3:10 ` majun (F) 2016-03-22 3:10 ` majun (F) 2016-05-05 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier 2016-05-05 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier 2016-05-06 1:12 ` majun (F) 2016-05-06 1:12 ` majun (F) 2016-05-06 7:32 ` Marc Zyngier 2016-05-06 7:32 ` Marc Zyngier 2016-05-06 9:07 ` majun (F) [this message] 2016-05-06 9:07 ` majun (F) -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2016-02-01 11:44 [RFC PATCH] irq/mbigen:Fix the problem of IO remap for duplicated physical address " MaJun 2016-02-01 11:57 ` Mark Rutland 2016-02-01 13:06 ` majun (F) 2016-02-01 13:25 ` Mark Rutland 2016-02-02 10:25 ` majun (F) 2016-02-02 11:43 ` Mark Rutland 2016-02-03 2:31 ` majun (F) 2016-02-03 11:16 ` Mark Rutland 2016-02-16 7:54 ` majun (F)
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=572C5EC4.4010204@huawei.com \ --to=majun258@huawei.com \ --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \ --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \ --cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \ --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \ --cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \ --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \ --cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \ --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=zhaojunhua@hisilicon.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.