From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945945AbcFHOYo (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:24:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f65.google.com ([209.85.220.65]:34203 "EHLO mail-pa0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423856AbcFHOYm (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:24:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 00/33] implement atomic_fetch_$op To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar References: <20160531101925.702692792@infradead.org> <20160602093304.GX3190@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160608124312.GA30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160608125530.GB11563@gmail.com> <20160608133242.GS30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Cc: "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "boqun.feng@gmail.com" , "waiman.long@hpe.com" , "fweisbec@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "rth@twiddle.net" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "egtvedt@samfundet.no" , "realmz6@gmail.com" , "ysato@users.sourceforge.jp" , "rkuo@codeaurora.org" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "geert@linux-m68k.org" From: Vineet Gupta Organization: Synopsys Message-ID: <57582A9F.2060307@synopsys.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:54:31 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160608133242.GS30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 08 June 2016 07:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:55:30PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> I'd much prefer to have all of these in the locking tree (i.e. tip:locking/core), >> to make it less painful all around. > > All the fetch_op stuff, yes certainly. But Vineet wanted to munge > arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h a bit in 4.7, which would make applying > the arc fetch_op patch tricky. > My patches are in linux-next already. I was hoping to squeeze in a different fix before sending the pull request to Linus. But I don't want to stall you, will do that first thing tomorrow morning. OK ?