From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758683AbdHYUnB (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:43:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40908 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755255AbdHYUm7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:42:59 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 81AA6C058EBF Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree To: Brijesh Singh , Tom Lendacky , Stephen Rothwell , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , KVM , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Yu Zhang , paolo.bonzini@gmail.com References: <20170825143930.494744fe@canb.auug.org.au> <2984689e-ab4e-0c22-7151-adfeeffce4ed@redhat.com> <2b021bf3-9ace-8678-0793-c0048500469c@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <575d1d5a-5cfb-49b4-0ce7-b78372739cb6@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:42:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 20:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/08/2017 22:41, Brijesh Singh wrote: >>>> > >> Neither my version nor yours is correct. :) The right one has [0][i] >> and [1][i] (I inverted the indices by mistake). >> >> With that change, you can include my >> >> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini >> > > Ingo, > > I assuming that this patch should be sent through the tip since SME support > came from tip. I will be submitting the patch very soon. Yes, that is correct. I cannot apply it directly to the KVM tree. Paolo