From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v4 12/13] ARM64 / ACPI: if we chose to boot from acpi then disable FDT Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:09:27 +0200 Message-ID: <5766378.doqChWUeyl@wuerfel> References: <1403840976-7456-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1403840976-7456-13-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:60535 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751127AbaF0JJq (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2014 05:09:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1403840976-7456-13-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org Cc: Hanjun Guo , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rric@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas On Friday 27 June 2014 11:49:35 Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Graeme Gregory > > If the early boot methods of acpi are happy that we have valid ACPI > tables and acpi=off has not been passed. Then do not unflat devicetree > effectively disabling further hardware probing from DT. > I guess this answers the question I had on patch 4 ;-) Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:09:27 +0200 Subject: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v4 12/13] ARM64 / ACPI: if we chose to boot from acpi then disable FDT In-Reply-To: <1403840976-7456-13-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> References: <1403840976-7456-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1403840976-7456-13-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Message-ID: <5766378.doqChWUeyl@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 27 June 2014 11:49:35 Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Graeme Gregory > > If the early boot methods of acpi are happy that we have valid ACPI > tables and acpi=off has not been passed. Then do not unflat devicetree > effectively disabling further hardware probing from DT. > I guess this answers the question I had on patch 4 ;-) Arnd