From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:58528 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751109AbcFWL0Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 07:26:25 -0400 Message-ID: <576BC73B.9070503@osg.samsung.com> (sfid-20160623_132643_083108_D2B946F6) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:25:47 +0100 From: Luis de Bethencourt MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Calaby CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Johnny Kim , Austin Shin , Chris Park , Tony Cho , Glen Lee , Leo Kim , Greg KH , linux-wireless , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix error handling in wilc_debugfs_init() References: <1466599154-4782-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 23/06/16 02:29, Julian Calaby wrote: > Hi All, > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis de Bethencourt > wrote: >> The common format to check if a function returned an error pointer is to >> use PTR_ERR(). Instead of ERR_PTR() which is used to return said errors. >> >> Also, if there was an error returning -EINVAL instead of -1 is more >> appropriate. > > These two changes could be argued to be separate changes deserving of > their own patches. > >> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt > > However if everyone else is ok with that, this is: > > Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby > > Thanks, > Hi Julian, If you don't mind I will resend as two separate patches and include your Reviewed-by in both. Thanks for the review, Luis