From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mk: fix parallel build of test resources
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:24:26 +0200
Message-ID: <576D429A.7040706@6wind.com>
References: <1466721363-24546-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <1466767379-7552-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <576D3E5A.6060108@6wind.com> <4598761.R2uGCUsYnI@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6080593F6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:24:33 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <4598761.R2uGCUsYnI@xps13>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>



On 06/24/2016 04:19 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-06-24 16:06, Olivier Matz:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On 06/24/2016 01:22 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> --- a/app/test/Makefile
>>> +++ b/app/test/Makefile
>>> @@ -43,14 +43,14 @@ define linked_resource
>>>  SRCS-y += $(1).res.o
>>>  $(1).res.o: $(2)
>>>  	@  echo '  MKRES $$@'
>>> -	$Q ln -fs $$< resource.tmp
>>> +	$Q [ "$$(<D)" = . ] || ln -fs $$<
>>
>> Maybe the symbolic link file in the build directory could be prefixed
>> with "lnk_"... (see following below)
> 
> yes...
>  
>>>  	$Q $(OBJCOPY) -I binary -B $(RTE_OBJCOPY_ARCH) -O $(RTE_OBJCOPY_TARGET) \
>>>  		--rename-section                                         \
>>>  			.data=.rodata,alloc,load,data,contents,readonly  \
>>> -		--redefine-sym _binary_resource_tmp_start=beg_$(1)       \
>>> -		--redefine-sym _binary_resource_tmp_end=end_$(1)         \
>>> -		--redefine-sym _binary_resource_tmp_size=siz_$(1)        \
>>> -		resource.tmp $$@ && rm -f resource.tmp
>>> +		--redefine-sym _binary_$$(subst .,_,$$(<F))_start=beg_$(1) \
>>> +		--redefine-sym _binary_$$(subst .,_,$$(<F))_end=end_$(1)   \
>>> +		--redefine-sym _binary_$$(subst .,_,$$(<F))_size=siz_$(1)  \
>>> +		$$(<F) $$@
>>>  endef
>>>  
>>>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_APP_TEST_RESOURCE_TAR),y)
>>> @@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_CMDLINE) := commands.c
>>>  SRCS-y += test.c
>>>  SRCS-y += resource.c
>>>  SRCS-y += test_resource.c
>>> -$(eval $(call linked_resource,test_resource_c,resource.c))
>>> +test_resource.res: test_resource.c
>>> +	@ cp $< $@
>>> +$(eval $(call linked_resource,test_resource_c,test_resource.res))
>>>  $(eval $(call linked_tar_resource,test_resource_tar,test_resource.c))
>>>  SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_APP_TEST_RESOURCE_TAR) += test_pci.c
>>>  $(eval $(call linked_tar_resource,test_pci_sysfs,test_pci_sysfs))
>>
>> ...this would avoid to rename the resource file and make the patch
>> easier to understand.
> 
> ... but it would be harder to understand how are named the resources in
> the build directory ;)
> Ideally we should not use a source file (referenced in SRCS-y) as a
> test resource.
> 

OK alright :)

Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>