All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] hwmon: (tmp102) Use devm_add_action to register cleanup function
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:02:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <576D75B8.2050406@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160624163604.GA21447@roeck-us.net>

On 06/24/2016 11:36 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:23:10AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 06/24/2016 09:54 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 06/24/2016 07:30 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> Hi Nishanth,
>>>>
>>>> On 06/24/2016 07:13 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>>>> On 06/23/2016 07:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>> By registering a cleanup function with devm_add_action(), we can
>>>>>> simplify the error path in the probe function and drop the remove
>>>>>> function entirely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>>>
>>>>> I dont seem to have a cover letter to reply to... but anyways..
>>>>>
>>>>> Before: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/17801376/
>>>>> After all 5 patches: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/17801824/
>>>>>
>>>>> Fails on beagleboard-X15 with:
>>>>> [   36.781509] tmp102 0-0048: No cache defaults, reading back from HW
>>>>> [   36.795940] tmp102 0-0048: unexpected config register value
>>>>>
>>>>> I have'nt bisected down on the specific patch in the series. Have you had a chance to test the series?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for testing. Yes, I did test it. Maybe different chip revisions, or different
>>>> initial config register values and I messed up there. Can you send me the output
>>>> of i2cdump (word wide) ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Before 5 patches:
>>>> # i2cdump -f 0 0x48 w
>>>>      0,8  1,9  2,a  3,b  4,c  5,d  6,e  7,f
>>>> 00: 7912 b062 004b 0050 c018 e006 0000 0000 
> 
> [ ... ]
>>>
>>> After 5 patches:
>>>>  i2cdump -y 0 0x48 w
>>>>      0,8  1,9  2,a  3,b  4,c  5,d  6,e  7,f
>>>> 00: 5024 a060 004b 0050 c018 e006 0000 0000 
> 
> [ .... ]
> 
>> I can try and debug the series once I get some spare time, might be
>> over the weekend or next week.
> 
> The register map, at least the initial one, is pretty much the same as mine
> and as expected. The configuration register in the second map is messed up,
> possible because of a write with wrong endianness.

Got a few mins skipping lunch.. ;)

I did a quick bisect, and it is indeed the patch #5 that breaks.
added http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/17812044/ and got:

tmp102 0-0048: regval = 0x0000ffff

That was weird. Does'nt look like endian-ness swap thingy

So, did the following hack to see all messages flowing in and out from
0x48 at bus controller driver level: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/17813093/
/ # dmesg|grep XXX
/ #

Before patch #5 (and on next-20160624):
the same diff gave:
http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/17813303/



> I bet the regmap_read() of the configuration register returns 0xa060 (or
> 0xb062) instead of 0x60a0 / 0x62b0 on your system. If you find the time,
> it would be great if you can confirm by printing the register value with
> the "unexpected config register value" message (guess I should have left
> that in place - I used it during testing ;-).
> 
> If that is the case, I'll probably have to drop the regmap changes, at least
> for now. It would mean that regmap is broken for chips like the LM75 (ie
> for all chips with 16-bit registers) on controllers supporting I2C_FUNC_I2C.

It does look like everything is getting cached out and no actual reads
are actually getting through to the bus controller driver even.

I tested on next-20160624 and used omap2plus_defconfig for the test.


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-24 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-24  0:28 Guenter Roeck
2016-06-24  0:28 ` [PATCH 2/5] hwmon: (tmp102) Drop FSF address Guenter Roeck
2016-06-24  0:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] hwmon: (tmp102) Improve handling of initial read delay Guenter Roeck
2016-06-24  0:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] hwmon: (tmp102) Rework chip configuration Guenter Roeck
2016-06-24  0:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] hwmon: (tmp102) Convert to use regmap, and drop local cache Guenter Roeck
2016-06-24 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/5] hwmon: (tmp102) Use devm_add_action to register cleanup function Nishanth Menon
2016-06-24 14:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-24 14:54     ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-24 15:23       ` Nishanth Menon
2016-06-24 15:31         ` Nishanth Menon
2016-06-24 16:36         ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-24 18:02           ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2016-06-24 18:18             ` Guenter Roeck
2016-06-24 18:21               ` Nishanth Menon
2016-06-25  1:24                 ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=576D75B8.2050406@ti.com \
    --to=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/5] hwmon: (tmp102) Use devm_add_action to register cleanup function' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.