From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <20160531141646.GG5951@hermes.click-hack.org> <574EE886.2020907@sigmatek.at> <20160601141238.GC14103@hermes.click-hack.org> <574FEB2D.5010509@sigmatek.at> <20160602082318.GB1801@hermes.click-hack.org> <5755204C.6090701@sigmatek.at> <20160606153545.GA376@hermes.click-hack.org> <5756D673.4080408@sigmatek.at> <20160607170050.GA13922@hermes.click-hack.org> <57714C60.4070407@sigmatek.at> <20160627160006.GF18662@hermes.click-hack.org> From: Wolfgang Netbal Message-ID: <57723097.8030803@sigmatek.at> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:08:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160627160006.GF18662@hermes.click-hack.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Performance impact after switching from 2.6.2.1 to 2.6.4 Reply-To: wolfgang.netbal@sigmatek.at List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org Am 2016-06-27 um 18:00 schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:55:12PM +0200, Wolfgang Netbal wrote: >> -Creating Kernel 3.0.43 with >> Xenomai 2.6.4 and copy it to new system -> still 7% slower > This contradicts what you said here: > https://xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2016-June/036370.html I always tried to speed up the new system, so I always tested the changes on the new system, so when I wrote that nothing changed I meant that the new system doesn speed up. Sorry for the missing details in the above post. >