From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755352AbcGFPk7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:40:59 -0400 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:41176 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755223AbcGFPkv (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:40:51 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drivers: reset: Add STM32 reset driver To: Philipp Zabel References: <1467640052-6770-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467640052-6770-3-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467653810.2224.77.camel@pengutronix.de> <577B61EA.5080703@st.com> <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de> CC: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Maxime Coquelin , Russell King , , , , , From: Gabriel Fernandez Message-ID: <577D264A.4050709@st.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 17:39:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.48.0.158] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-07-06_06:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Philipp On 07/05/2016 03:29 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2016, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Fernandez: > [...] >>>> +static const struct reset_control_ops stm32_reset_ops = { >>>> + .assert = stm32_reset_assert, >>>> + .deassert = stm32_reset_deassert, >>> Are the registers not readable, or did you choose not to >>> implement .status on purpose? >> We choose to not implement. > Ok. Because of size issues or just because you don't need them in any of > your drivers? Because i don't need them. BR Gabriel > > regards > Philipp > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gabriel Fernandez Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drivers: reset: Add STM32 reset driver Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 17:39:54 +0200 Message-ID: <577D264A.4050709@st.com> References: <1467640052-6770-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467640052-6770-3-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467653810.2224.77.camel@pengutronix.de> <577B61EA.5080703@st.com> <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Philipp Zabel Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alexandre.torgue@st.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , patrice.chotard@st.com, Rob Herring , Maxime Coquelin , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Philipp On 07/05/2016 03:29 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2016, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Fernandez: > [...] >>>> +static const struct reset_control_ops stm32_reset_ops = { >>>> + .assert = stm32_reset_assert, >>>> + .deassert = stm32_reset_deassert, >>> Are the registers not readable, or did you choose not to >>> implement .status on purpose? >> We choose to not implement. > Ok. Because of size issues or just because you don't need them in any of > your drivers? Because i don't need them. BR Gabriel > > regards > Philipp > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gabriel.fernandez@st.com (Gabriel Fernandez) Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 17:39:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] drivers: reset: Add STM32 reset driver In-Reply-To: <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de> References: <1467640052-6770-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467640052-6770-3-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1467653810.2224.77.camel@pengutronix.de> <577B61EA.5080703@st.com> <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <577D264A.4050709@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Philipp On 07/05/2016 03:29 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2016, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Fernandez: > [...] >>>> +static const struct reset_control_ops stm32_reset_ops = { >>>> + .assert = stm32_reset_assert, >>>> + .deassert = stm32_reset_deassert, >>> Are the registers not readable, or did you choose not to >>> implement .status on purpose? >> We choose to not implement. > Ok. Because of size issues or just because you don't need them in any of > your drivers? Because i don't need them. BR Gabriel > > regards > Philipp >