From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/arm: register clocks used by the hypervisor Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:21:44 +0100 Message-ID: <577F70A8.7020406@arm.com> References: <1467282752-14053-1-git-send-email-dirk.behme@de.bosch.com> <146776885213.35356.11565744417822933094@resonance> <577D035C.7090504@arm.com> <146783774807.35356.6362595927321996311@resonance> <146794625655.73491.13497001485518368066@resonance> <373bf006-1a5e-0b2b-278d-d5ec0d8737fd@de.bosch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <373bf006-1a5e-0b2b-278d-d5ec0d8737fd@de.bosch.com> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dirk Behme , Michael Turquette , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Stefano Stabellini , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Dirk, On 08/07/16 06:51, Dirk Behme wrote: > On 08.07.2016 04:50, Michael Turquette wrote: >> Quoting Dirk Behme (2016-07-07 00:32:34) >> The two issues to resolve are: >> >> 1) does consuming these hardware resources from the Linux kernel fit >> correctly with the Xen model? > > > I think so. Julien, what do you think? I don't think it fits the Xen model. I will give more details on the v3 as your commit message give an example with is contradictory to the model. Regards, -- Julien Grall From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: julien.grall@arm.com (Julien Grall) Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:21:44 +0100 Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/arm: register clocks used by the hypervisor In-Reply-To: <373bf006-1a5e-0b2b-278d-d5ec0d8737fd@de.bosch.com> References: <1467282752-14053-1-git-send-email-dirk.behme@de.bosch.com> <146776885213.35356.11565744417822933094@resonance> <577D035C.7090504@arm.com> <146783774807.35356.6362595927321996311@resonance> <146794625655.73491.13497001485518368066@resonance> <373bf006-1a5e-0b2b-278d-d5ec0d8737fd@de.bosch.com> Message-ID: <577F70A8.7020406@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Dirk, On 08/07/16 06:51, Dirk Behme wrote: > On 08.07.2016 04:50, Michael Turquette wrote: >> Quoting Dirk Behme (2016-07-07 00:32:34) >> The two issues to resolve are: >> >> 1) does consuming these hardware resources from the Linux kernel fit >> correctly with the Xen model? > > > I think so. Julien, what do you think? I don't think it fits the Xen model. I will give more details on the v3 as your commit message give an example with is contradictory to the model. Regards, -- Julien Grall