All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Wrap drm_gem_object_lookup in i915_gem_object_lookup
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:28:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <578F6050.7090701@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469005202-9659-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

On 20/07/16 09:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
> For symmetry with a forthcoming i915_gem_object_get() and
> i915_gem_object_pu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h        | 20 +++++++++++-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c        | 58 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c |  8 ++---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c   |  4 +--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c   |  5 ++-
>   5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 2131e7f1e57a..47f244f9c64e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2286,7 +2286,25 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
>   		} userptr;
>   	};
>   };
> -#define to_intel_bo(x) container_of(x, struct drm_i915_gem_object, base)
> +
> +static inline struct drm_i915_gem_object *
> +to_intel_bo(struct drm_gem_object *gem)
> +{
> +	/* Assert that to_intel_bo(NULL) == NULL */
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct drm_i915_gem_object, base));
> +
> +	return container_of(gem, struct drm_i915_gem_object, base);
> +}

Yes, I think this is a much better way of doing the conversion, 'cos 
it's type-safe and we get that all-important check that 'base' is still 
at offset 0.

In my variant on this, I also introduced the reverse mapping, 
to_gem_object(), so that we could completely abstract away the 
conversion back-and-forth between the two classes. Do you think that 
would be worth adding here too?

> +static inline struct drm_i915_gem_object *
> +i915_gem_object_lookup(struct drm_file *file, u32 handle)
> +{
> +	return to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, handle));
> +}
> +
> +__deprecated
> +extern struct drm_gem_object *
> +drm_gem_object_lookup(struct drm_file *file, u32 handle);
>
>   static inline bool
>   i915_gem_object_has_struct_page(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index d825db7b763d..970496419098 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -864,8 +864,8 @@ i915_gem_pread_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL) {

Yes, this construct was not only bizarre, but could actually cause 
problems on some compilers. See
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2012-April/020514.html

Just writing 'obj' is much nicer :)

> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> +	if (!obj) {
>   		ret = -ENOENT;
>   		goto unlock;
>   	}
> @@ -1280,8 +1280,8 @@ i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto put_rpm;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> +	if (!obj) {
>   		ret = -ENOENT;
>   		goto unlock;
>   	}
> @@ -1497,8 +1497,8 @@ i915_gem_set_domain_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> +	if (!obj) {
>   		ret = -ENOENT;
>   		goto unlock;
>   	}
> @@ -1546,8 +1546,8 @@ i915_gem_sw_finish_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> +	if (!obj) {
>   		ret = -ENOENT;
>   		goto unlock;
>   	}
> @@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ i915_gem_mmap_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   		    struct drm_file *file)
>   {
>   	struct drm_i915_gem_mmap *args = data;
> -	struct drm_gem_object *obj;
> +	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>   	unsigned long addr;
>
>   	if (args->flags & ~(I915_MMAP_WC))
> @@ -1596,19 +1596,19 @@ i915_gem_mmap_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	if (args->flags & I915_MMAP_WC && !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT))
>   		return -ENODEV;
>
> -	obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> -	if (obj == NULL)
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> +	if (!obj)
>   		return -ENOENT;
>
>   	/* prime objects have no backing filp to GEM mmap
>   	 * pages from.
>   	 */
> -	if (!obj->filp) {
> -		drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(obj);
> +	if (!obj->base.filp) {
> +		drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&obj->base);
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>
> -	addr = vm_mmap(obj->filp, 0, args->size,
> +	addr = vm_mmap(obj->base.filp, 0, args->size,
>   		       PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED,
>   		       args->offset);
>   	if (args->flags & I915_MMAP_WC) {
> @@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ i915_gem_mmap_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   		struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>
>   		if (down_write_killable(&mm->mmap_sem)) {
> -			drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(obj);
> +			drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&obj->base);
>   			return -EINTR;
>   		}
>   		vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
> @@ -1628,9 +1628,9 @@ i915_gem_mmap_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   		up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
>
>   		/* This may race, but that's ok, it only gets set */
> -		WRITE_ONCE(to_intel_bo(obj)->has_wc_mmap, true);
> +		WRITE_ONCE(obj->has_wc_mmap, true);
>   	}
> -	drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(obj);
> +	drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&obj->base);
>   	if (IS_ERR((void *)addr))
>   		return addr;
>
> @@ -1968,8 +1968,8 @@ i915_gem_mmap_gtt(struct drm_file *file,
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, handle);
> +	if (!obj) {
>   		ret = -ENOENT;
>   		goto unlock;
>   	}
> @@ -2792,8 +2792,8 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->bo_handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, args->bo_handle);
> +	if (!obj) {
>   		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>   		return -ENOENT;
>   	}
> @@ -3596,8 +3596,8 @@ int i915_gem_get_caching_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	struct drm_i915_gem_caching *args = data;
>   	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL)
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> +	if (!obj)
>   		return -ENOENT;
>
>   	switch (obj->cache_level) {
> @@ -3657,8 +3657,8 @@ int i915_gem_set_caching_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto rpm_put;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> +	if (!obj) {
>   		ret = -ENOENT;
>   		goto unlock;
>   	}
> @@ -4026,8 +4026,8 @@ i915_gem_busy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> +	if (!obj) {
>   		ret = -ENOENT;
>   		goto unlock;
>   	}
> @@ -4091,8 +4091,8 @@ i915_gem_madvise_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file_priv, args->handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL) {
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file_priv, args->handle);
> +	if (!obj) {
>   		ret = -ENOENT;
>   		goto unlock;
>   	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
> index 8030199731db..46e80f30afcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
> @@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ i915_gem_set_tiling(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>   	int ret = 0;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL)
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> +	if (!obj)
>   		return -ENOENT;
>
>   	if (!i915_tiling_ok(dev,
> @@ -297,8 +297,8 @@ i915_gem_get_tiling(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>   	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL)
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(file, args->handle);
> +	if (!obj)
>   		return -ENOENT;
>
>   	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 2f7af855a585..77d320584478 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -15089,8 +15089,8 @@ intel_user_framebuffer_create(struct drm_device *dev,
>   	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>   	struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 mode_cmd = *user_mode_cmd;
>
> -	obj = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(filp, mode_cmd.handles[0]));
> -	if (&obj->base == NULL)
> +	obj = i915_gem_object_lookup(filp, mode_cmd.handles[0]);
> +	if (!obj)
>   		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>
>   	fb = intel_framebuffer_create(dev, &mode_cmd, obj);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> index 3212d8806b5a..5ca797b01ccb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> @@ -1122,9 +1122,8 @@ int intel_overlay_put_image_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   	}
>   	crtc = to_intel_crtc(drmmode_crtc);
>
> -	new_bo = to_intel_bo(drm_gem_object_lookup(file_priv,
> -						   put_image_rec->bo_handle));
> -	if (&new_bo->base == NULL) {
> +	new_bo = i915_gem_object_lookup(file_priv, put_image_rec->bo_handle);
> +	if (!new_bo) {
>   		ret = -ENOENT;
>   		goto out_free;
>   	}

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-20 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-20  8:59 A simple batch of churn to make reference handling look consistent Chris Wilson
2016-07-20  8:59 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: Rename request reference/unreference to get/put Chris Wilson
2016-07-20  8:59 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: Rename i915_gem_context_reference/unreference() Chris Wilson
2016-07-20  8:59 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Wrap drm_gem_object_lookup in i915_gem_object_lookup Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 11:28   ` Dave Gordon [this message]
2016-07-20 11:38     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 11:38   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 12:03     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20  8:59 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: Wrap drm_gem_object_reference in i915_gem_object_get Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 11:38   ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 11:45     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 11:45   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20  8:59 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: Rename drm_gem_object_unreference in preparation for lockless free Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 11:43   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20 11:51     ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 12:11       ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-21 16:58   ` [PATCH] drm/i915: use i915_gem_object_put_unlocked() after releasing mutex Dave Gordon
2016-07-21 17:25     ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-20  8:59 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: Rename drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked in preparation for lockless free Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 12:04   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20  9:00 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Treat ringbuffer writes as write to normal memory Chris Wilson
2016-07-20  9:00 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: Rename ring->virtual_start as ring->vaddr Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 11:54   ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 12:07   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20  9:00 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Convert i915_semaphores_is_enabled over to early sanitize Chris Wilson
2016-07-20 12:18   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-07-20  9:38 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Rename request reference/unreference to get/put Patchwork
2016-07-22  5:28 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Rename request reference/unreference to get/put (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=578F6050.7090701@intel.com \
    --to=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.