From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F80E71 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [58.251.152.64]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051AE122 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:18:38 +0000 (UTC) To: References: <20160727232054.GA30998@linux-80c1.suse> From: "Wangnan (F)" Message-ID: <579AF4EF.6070605@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:17:19 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160727232054.GA30998@linux-80c1.suse> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] self nomination List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 2016/7/28 7:20, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to nominate myself for kernel summit this year. > > I hack on various core subsystems mainly in the name of performance and > am particularly interested in the following topics/discussions: > > - C++11 atomics/kernel memory model. > - Upstreaming PREEMPT_RT. > - Regression tracking. > - (and to a lesser degree unit testing) > > In addition, I'm wondering if there's any interest in a performance > session (getting to know some of the bottlenecks that are currently > making folks cry), like Chris Mason has been doing in past kernel > summits for fb specific workloads. > Yes, we need a performance related session. I posted a proposal but not very responsive. I can talk about tracing and tools/perf, especially the progress of BPF. We can discuss something about performance profiling based on these tracing result. Thank you. > Thanks, > Davidlohr > _______________________________________________ > Ksummit-discuss mailing list > Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss