All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [OE-core][PATCH] kernel-fitimage: images should not be signed with the same keys as the configurations
@ 2021-08-06 16:10 Thomas Perrot
  2021-08-08 19:19 ` Alexandre Belloni
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Perrot @ 2021-08-06 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Thomas Perrot

Otherwise the "required" property, from UBOOT_DTB_BINARY, will be set to "conf"
and no error will be raised in case of error.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Perrot <thomas.perrot@bootlin.com>
---
 meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
index a9d1002200c9..72f692e40e63 100644
--- a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
@@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ FIT_DESC ?= "Kernel fitImage for ${DISTRO_NAME}/${PV}/${MACHINE}"
 # Sign individual images as well
 FIT_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL ?= "0"
 
+# Keys used to sign individually images nodes.
+# The keys to sign images nodes must be different from those used to sign
+# configurations nodes, otherwise the "required" property, from
+# UBOOT_DTB_BINARY, will be set to "conf", because "conf" prevails on "image".
+# Then images signature checking will not be mandatory and no error will be
+# raised.
+# UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME = "dev2" # keys name in keydir (eg. "dev2.crt", "dev2.key")
+
 #
 # Emit the fitImage ITS header
 #
@@ -121,7 +129,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_kernel() {
 
 	kernel_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
 	kernel_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
-	kernel_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
+	kernel_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
 
 	ENTRYPOINT="${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}"
 	if [ -n "${UBOOT_ENTRYSYMBOL}" ]; then
@@ -167,7 +175,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_dtb() {
 
 	dtb_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
 	dtb_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
-	dtb_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
+	dtb_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
 
 	dtb_loadline=""
 	dtb_ext=${DTB##*.}
@@ -214,7 +222,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_boot_script() {
 
         bootscr_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
 	bootscr_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
-	bootscr_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
+	bootscr_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
 
         cat << EOF >> ${1}
                 bootscr-${2} {
@@ -278,7 +286,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_ramdisk() {
 
 	ramdisk_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
 	ramdisk_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
-	ramdisk_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
+	ramdisk_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
 	ramdisk_loadline=""
 	ramdisk_entryline=""
 
@@ -475,6 +483,10 @@ fitimage_assemble() {
 	bootscr_id=""
 	rm -f ${1} arch/${ARCH}/boot/${2}
 
+	if [ "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}" = "${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}" ]; then
+		bbfatal "Keys used to sign images and configuration nodes must be different."
+	fi
+
 	fitimage_emit_fit_header ${1}
 
 	#
@@ -674,7 +686,7 @@ do_kernel_generate_rsa_keys() {
 
 	if [ "${UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] && [ "${FIT_GENERATE_KEYS}" = "1" ]; then
 
-		# Generate keys only if they don't already exist
+		# Generate keys to sign configuration nodes, only if they don't already exist
 		if [ ! -f "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYDIR}/${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}".key ] || \
 			[ ! -f "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYDIR}/${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}".crt ]; then
 
@@ -691,6 +703,24 @@ do_kernel_generate_rsa_keys() {
 				-key "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYDIR}/${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}".key \
 				-out "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYDIR}/${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}".crt
 		fi
+
+		# Generate keys to sign image nodes, only if they don't already exist
+		if [ ! -f "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYDIR}/${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}".key ] || \
+			[ ! -f "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYDIR}/${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}".crt ]; then
+
+			# make directory if it does not already exist
+			mkdir -p "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYDIR}"
+
+			echo "Generating RSA private key for signing fitImage"
+			openssl genrsa ${FIT_KEY_GENRSA_ARGS} -out \
+				"${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYDIR}/${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}".key \
+			"${FIT_SIGN_NUMBITS}"
+
+			echo "Generating certificate for signing fitImage"
+			openssl req ${FIT_KEY_REQ_ARGS} "${FIT_KEY_SIGN_PKCS}" \
+				-key "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYDIR}/${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}".key \
+				-out "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYDIR}/${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}".crt
+		fi
 	fi
 }
 
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [OE-core][PATCH] kernel-fitimage: images should not be signed with the same keys as the configurations
  2021-08-06 16:10 [OE-core][PATCH] kernel-fitimage: images should not be signed with the same keys as the configurations Thomas Perrot
@ 2021-08-08 19:19 ` Alexandre Belloni
  2021-08-09  8:37   ` Thomas Perrot
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Belloni @ 2021-08-08 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Perrot; +Cc: openembedded-core

Hello,

On 06/08/2021 18:10:38+0200, Thomas Perrot wrote:
> Otherwise the "required" property, from UBOOT_DTB_BINARY, will be set to "conf"
> and no error will be raised in case of error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Perrot <thomas.perrot@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> index a9d1002200c9..72f692e40e63 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> @@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ FIT_DESC ?= "Kernel fitImage for ${DISTRO_NAME}/${PV}/${MACHINE}"
>  # Sign individual images as well
>  FIT_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL ?= "0"
>  
> +# Keys used to sign individually images nodes.
> +# The keys to sign images nodes must be different from those used to sign
> +# configurations nodes, otherwise the "required" property, from
> +# UBOOT_DTB_BINARY, will be set to "conf", because "conf" prevails on "image".
> +# Then images signature checking will not be mandatory and no error will be
> +# raised.
> +# UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME = "dev2" # keys name in keydir (eg. "dev2.crt", "dev2.key")
> +
>  #
>  # Emit the fitImage ITS header
>  #
> @@ -121,7 +129,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_kernel() {
>  
>  	kernel_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
>  	kernel_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> -	kernel_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> +	kernel_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
>  
>  	ENTRYPOINT="${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}"
>  	if [ -n "${UBOOT_ENTRYSYMBOL}" ]; then
> @@ -167,7 +175,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_dtb() {
>  
>  	dtb_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
>  	dtb_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> -	dtb_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> +	dtb_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
>  
>  	dtb_loadline=""
>  	dtb_ext=${DTB##*.}
> @@ -214,7 +222,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_boot_script() {
>  
>          bootscr_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
>  	bootscr_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> -	bootscr_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> +	bootscr_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
>  
>          cat << EOF >> ${1}
>                  bootscr-${2} {
> @@ -278,7 +286,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_ramdisk() {
>  
>  	ramdisk_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
>  	ramdisk_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> -	ramdisk_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> +	ramdisk_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
>  	ramdisk_loadline=""
>  	ramdisk_entryline=""
>  
> @@ -475,6 +483,10 @@ fitimage_assemble() {
>  	bootscr_id=""
>  	rm -f ${1} arch/${ARCH}/boot/${2}
>  
> +	if [ "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}" = "${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}" ]; then
> +		bbfatal "Keys used to sign images and configuration nodes must be different."

This breaks oe-selftest, as seen in:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/2383/steps/14/logs/stdio


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [OE-core][PATCH] kernel-fitimage: images should not be signed with the same keys as the configurations
  2021-08-08 19:19 ` Alexandre Belloni
@ 2021-08-09  8:37   ` Thomas Perrot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Perrot @ 2021-08-09  8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Alexandre Belloni

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3893 bytes --]

Hello Alexandre,

On Sun, 2021-08-08 at 21:19 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 06/08/2021 18:10:38+0200, Thomas Perrot wrote:
> > Otherwise the "required" property, from UBOOT_DTB_BINARY, will be set
> > to "conf"
> > and no error will be raised in case of error.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Perrot <thomas.perrot@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > --
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > index a9d1002200c9..72f692e40e63 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > @@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ FIT_DESC ?= "Kernel fitImage for
> > ${DISTRO_NAME}/${PV}/${MACHINE}"
> >  # Sign individual images as well
> >  FIT_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL ?= "0"
> >  
> > +# Keys used to sign individually images nodes.
> > +# The keys to sign images nodes must be different from those used to
> > sign
> > +# configurations nodes, otherwise the "required" property, from
> > +# UBOOT_DTB_BINARY, will be set to "conf", because "conf" prevails
> > on "image".
> > +# Then images signature checking will not be mandatory and no error
> > will be
> > +# raised.
> > +# UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME = "dev2" # keys name in keydir (eg.
> > "dev2.crt", "dev2.key")
> > +
> >  #
> >  # Emit the fitImage ITS header
> >  #
> > @@ -121,7 +129,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_kernel() {
> >  
> >         kernel_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         kernel_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       kernel_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       kernel_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >  
> >         ENTRYPOINT="${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}"
> >         if [ -n "${UBOOT_ENTRYSYMBOL}" ]; then
> > @@ -167,7 +175,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_dtb() {
> >  
> >         dtb_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         dtb_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       dtb_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       dtb_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >  
> >         dtb_loadline=""
> >         dtb_ext=${DTB##*.}
> > @@ -214,7 +222,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_boot_script() {
> >  
> >          bootscr_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         bootscr_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       bootscr_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       bootscr_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >  
> >          cat << EOF >> ${1}
> >                  bootscr-${2} {
> > @@ -278,7 +286,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_ramdisk() {
> >  
> >         ramdisk_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         ramdisk_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       ramdisk_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       ramdisk_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >         ramdisk_loadline=""
> >         ramdisk_entryline=""
> >  
> > @@ -475,6 +483,10 @@ fitimage_assemble() {
> >         bootscr_id=""
> >         rm -f ${1} arch/${ARCH}/boot/${2}
> >  
> > +       if [ "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}" = "${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}" ];
> > then
> > +               bbfatal "Keys used to sign images and configuration
> > nodes must be different."
> 
> This breaks oe-selftest, as seen in:
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/2383/steps/14/logs/stdio
> 

Thank you for the feedback.

The tests also need to be updated, so I will submit a v2, including the
required changes on the test side.

Best regards,
Thomas Perrot

> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Perrot, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 673 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-09  8:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-06 16:10 [OE-core][PATCH] kernel-fitimage: images should not be signed with the same keys as the configurations Thomas Perrot
2021-08-08 19:19 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-08-09  8:37   ` Thomas Perrot

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.