From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baNBU-0001oA-23 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:16:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baNBO-00041y-OL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:16:35 -0400 Received: from [59.151.112.132] (port=51471 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baNBO-00041h-8y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:16:30 -0400 References: <1471444747-6277-1-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <1471444747-6277-4-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <7b932d72-276c-912a-d1fb-85ed88e67dfa@redhat.com> <57B5B3FF.8010003@cn.fujitsu.com> From: Cao jin Message-ID: <57B5B72C.8020708@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:25:00 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] e1000e: fix for migration compatibility List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Dmitry Fleytman , Marcel Apfelbaum , Jason Wang , Markus Armbruster , "Michael S. Tsirkin" On 08/18/2016 09:04 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 18/08/2016 15:11, Cao jin wrote: >> >> >> On 08/18/2016 06:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 17/08/2016 16:39, Cao jin wrote: >>>> commit 66bf7d58 removed internal msi state flag E1000E_USE_MSI, but it >>>> is used by intr_state which exists in vmstate. Restore it for migration >>>> to older QEMU versions >>>> >>>> CC: Dmitry Fleytman >>>> CC: Jason Wang >>>> CC: Markus Armbruster >>>> CC: Marcel Apfelbaum >>>> CC: Michael S. Tsirkin >>>> Signed-off-by: Cao jin >>> >>> Not necessary. No released version of QEMU had e1000e and lacked commit >>> 66bf7d58. >>> >>> Paolo >>> >> >> Ok, then I will make this patch as separated one and send it out asap, >> so maybe it goes in 2.7 > > It's not necessary at all; why would it be useful in 2.7? > > Paolo > commit 66bf7d58I already removed E1000E_USE_MSI, so I think maybe I can send a patch to remove E1000E_USE_MSIX & intr_state, so there will be no migration compatibility issue