All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	dario.faggioli@citrix.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] VMX: Fixup PI descritpor when cpu is offline
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 02:48:44 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57C8078C020000780010AC0F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472615791-8664-7-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com>

>>> On 31.08.16 at 05:56, <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> +void vmx_pi_desc_fixup(int cpu)

unsigned int

> +{
> +    unsigned int new_cpu, dest;
> +    unsigned long flags;
> +    struct arch_vmx_struct *vmx, *tmp;
> +    spinlock_t *new_lock, *old_lock = &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, cpu).lock;
> +    struct list_head *blocked_vcpus = &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, cpu).list;
> +
> +    if ( !iommu_intpost )
> +        return;
> +
> +    spin_lock_irqsave(old_lock, flags);
> +
> +    list_for_each_entry_safe(vmx, tmp, blocked_vcpus, pi_blocking.list)
> +    {
> +        /*
> +         * We need to find an online cpu as the NDST of the PI descriptor, it
> +         * doesn't matter whether it is within the cpupool of the domain or
> +         * not. As long as it is online, the vCPU will be woken up once the
> +         * notification event arrives.
> +         */
> +restart:

I'd prefer if you did this without label and goto, but in any case
labels should be indented by at least one space. Yet ...

> +        new_cpu = cpumask_any(&cpu_online_map);
> +        new_lock = &per_cpu(vmx_pi_blocking, new_cpu).lock;
> +
> +        spin_lock(new_lock);
> +
> +        /*
> +         * If the new_cpu is not online, that means it became offline between
> +         * we got 'new_cpu' and acquiring its lock above, we need to find
> +         * another online cpu instead. Such as, this fucntion is being called
> +         * on 'new_cpu' at the same time. Can this happen??
> +         */
> +        if ( !cpu_online(new_cpu) )
> +        {
> +            spin_unlock(new_lock);
> +            goto restart;
> +        }

... I think this too has been discussed before: Is this case really
possible? You're in the context of a CPU_DEAD or CPU_UP_CANCELED
notification, which both get issued with cpu_add_remove_lock held.
How can a second CPU go down in parallel?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-01  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-31  3:56 [PATCH v3 0/6] VMX: Properly handle pi descriptor and per-cpu blocking list Feng Wu
2016-08-31  3:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] VMX: Statically assign two PI hooks Feng Wu
2016-09-01  8:16   ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-01  9:13     ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-01  9:23       ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-01  9:38         ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-06  8:42   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-06  9:53     ` Wu, Feng
2016-08-31  3:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] VMX: Properly handle pi when all the assigned devices are removed Feng Wu
2016-09-01  8:21   ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-01  9:22     ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-01 10:23       ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-01 13:12         ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-06  8:58   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-08-31  3:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] VMX: Cleanup PI per-cpu blocking list when vcpu is destroyed Feng Wu
2016-09-06  9:21   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-06 23:27     ` Wu, Feng
2016-08-31  3:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] Pause/Unpause the domain before/after assigning PI hooks Feng Wu
2016-09-01  8:29   ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02  1:46     ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02  7:04       ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02  7:31         ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02  8:16           ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02  8:40             ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02  9:25               ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02 10:30                 ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02 10:45                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02 13:15                     ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02 13:54                       ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-05  3:11                         ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-05  9:27                           ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-14  2:23                           ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-14  8:46                             ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-14 14:51                             ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-18  8:37                               ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-19 23:12                                 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-20  0:48                                   ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-20  7:31                                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-20  7:53                                     ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-20  8:13                                     ` Dario Faggioli
2016-09-20  8:18                                       ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-23 14:19                       ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-26  2:53                         ` Wu, Feng
2016-08-31  3:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] VT-d: No need to set irq affinity for posted format IRTE Feng Wu
2016-09-01  8:38   ` Jan Beulich
2016-09-02  1:58     ` Wu, Feng
2016-08-31  3:56 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] VMX: Fixup PI descritpor when cpu is offline Feng Wu
2016-09-01  8:48   ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2016-09-02  3:25     ` Wu, Feng
2016-09-02  7:08       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57C8078C020000780010AC0F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.