From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sakari Ailus Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] ACPI graph support Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 01:02:01 +0300 Message-ID: <57F6C9D9.4010109@linux.intel.com> References: <1475621148-21427-1-git-send-email-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20161005092215.GA20248@red-moon> <20161005114129.GI1765@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20161005150641.GA22282@red-moon> <20161005153229.GO1765@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20161005161800.GA22433@red-moon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:43728 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752434AbcJFWCG (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2016 18:02:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Mika Westerberg , ACPI Devel Maling List , Mark Rutland , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Al Stone Hi Rafael, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I think that the target subsystem (V4L in this particular case) should > be notified of this in the first place as they are the user of the > bindings in question. The related V4L2 patchset is here and it links to this discussion as well: -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com