From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752431AbcJKLLa (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 07:11:30 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:25201 "EHLO szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752060AbcJKLL3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 07:11:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid To: Will Deacon References: <1472712907-12700-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <1472712907-12700-11-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <57FC43F4.1020909@huawei.com> <20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com> CC: Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , Rob Herring , "Frank Rowand" , devicetree , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , Zefan Li , Xinwei Hu , Tianhong Ding , Hanjun Guo From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Message-ID: <57FCC738.7050005@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:04:24 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.23.164] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2016/10/11 18:16, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:44:20AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >> On 2016/9/1 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote: >>> If HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is selected, and some memoryless numa nodes are >>> actually exist. The percpu variable areas and numa control blocks of that >>> memoryless numa nodes must be allocated from the nearest available node >>> to improve performance. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei >>> --- >>> include/linux/memblock.h | 1 + >>> mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) >> >> Hi Will, >> It seems no one take care about this, how about I move below function into arch/arm64/mm/numa.c >> again? So that, merge it and patch 11 into one. > > I'd rather you reposted it after the merge window so we can see what to > do with it then. The previous posting was really hard to figure out and > mixed lots of different concepts into one series, so it's not completely > surprising that it didn't all get picked up. OK, thanks. > > Will > > . > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:04:24 +0800 Message-ID: <57FCC738.7050005@huawei.com> References: <1472712907-12700-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <1472712907-12700-11-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <57FC43F4.1020909@huawei.com> <20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Will Deacon Cc: devicetree , Zefan Li , Catalin Marinas , Hanjun Guo , linux-kernel , Xinwei Hu , linux-mm , Rob Herring , Tianhong Ding , Andrew Morton , Frank Rowand , linux-arm-kernel List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 2016/10/11 18:16, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:44:20AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >> On 2016/9/1 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote: >>> If HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is selected, and some memoryless numa nodes are >>> actually exist. The percpu variable areas and numa control blocks of that >>> memoryless numa nodes must be allocated from the nearest available node >>> to improve performance. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei >>> --- >>> include/linux/memblock.h | 1 + >>> mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) >> >> Hi Will, >> It seems no one take care about this, how about I move below function into arch/arm64/mm/numa.c >> again? So that, merge it and patch 11 into one. > > I'd rather you reposted it after the merge window so we can see what to > do with it then. The previous posting was really hard to figure out and > mixed lots of different concepts into one series, so it's not completely > surprising that it didn't all get picked up. OK, thanks. > > Will > > . > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f70.google.com (mail-oi0-f70.google.com [209.85.218.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9658D6B0038 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 07:11:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f70.google.com with SMTP id e200so34704991oig.4 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 04:11:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com. [119.145.14.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11si1034675otz.289.2016.10.11.04.11.31 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 04:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid References: <1472712907-12700-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <1472712907-12700-11-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <57FC43F4.1020909@huawei.com> <20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com> From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Message-ID: <57FCC738.7050005@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:04:24 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Will Deacon Cc: Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , devicetree , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , Zefan Li , Xinwei Hu , Tianhong Ding , Hanjun Guo On 2016/10/11 18:16, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:44:20AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >> On 2016/9/1 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote: >>> If HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is selected, and some memoryless numa nodes are >>> actually exist. The percpu variable areas and numa control blocks of that >>> memoryless numa nodes must be allocated from the nearest available node >>> to improve performance. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei >>> --- >>> include/linux/memblock.h | 1 + >>> mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) >> >> Hi Will, >> It seems no one take care about this, how about I move below function into arch/arm64/mm/numa.c >> again? So that, merge it and patch 11 into one. > > I'd rather you reposted it after the merge window so we can see what to > do with it then. The previous posting was really hard to figure out and > mixed lots of different concepts into one series, so it's not completely > surprising that it didn't all get picked up. OK, thanks. > > Will > > . > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thunder.leizhen@huawei.com (Leizhen (ThunderTown)) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:04:24 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v8 10/16] mm/memblock: add a new function memblock_alloc_near_nid In-Reply-To: <20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com> References: <1472712907-12700-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <1472712907-12700-11-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <57FC43F4.1020909@huawei.com> <20161011101623.GC23648@arm.com> Message-ID: <57FCC738.7050005@huawei.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2016/10/11 18:16, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:44:20AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >> On 2016/9/1 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote: >>> If HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is selected, and some memoryless numa nodes are >>> actually exist. The percpu variable areas and numa control blocks of that >>> memoryless numa nodes must be allocated from the nearest available node >>> to improve performance. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei >>> --- >>> include/linux/memblock.h | 1 + >>> mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) >> >> Hi Will, >> It seems no one take care about this, how about I move below function into arch/arm64/mm/numa.c >> again? So that, merge it and patch 11 into one. > > I'd rather you reposted it after the merge window so we can see what to > do with it then. The previous posting was really hard to figure out and > mixed lots of different concepts into one series, so it's not completely > surprising that it didn't all get picked up. OK, thanks. > > Will > > . >