All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, saurav.girepunje@gmail.com,
	Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
Cc: fabioaiuto83@gmail.com, ross.schm.dev@gmail.com,
	marcocesati@gmail.com, insafonov@gmail.com,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: os_dep: simplify the return statement.
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 09:24:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5843476.m7FxXixzUK@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWJ0vSrgsiKK7suE@user>

On Sunday, October 10, 2021 7:06:05 AM CEST Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> Remove the unneeded and redundant check of variable on goto out.
> Simplify the return using multiple goto label to avoid
> unneeded check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> ChangeLog V2:
> 	-Add goto out after the memcpy for no error case return with
> 	 ret only. Free is not required on no error case.
> 
> ChangeLog V1:
> 	-Remove the unneeded and redundant check of variable on
> 	 goto out.
> 	-Simplify the return using multiple goto label to avoid
> 	 unneeded check.
> 
>  .../staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c | 22 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c b/drivers/
staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
> index 0868f56e2979..ae9579dc0848 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c
> @@ -2312,7 +2312,7 @@ static int rtw_cfg80211_add_monitor_if(struct adapter 
*padapter, char *name, str
>  	mon_wdev = rtw_zmalloc(sizeof(struct wireless_dev));
>  	if (!mon_wdev) {
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto out;
> +		goto err_zmalloc;
>  	}
> 
>  	mon_wdev->wiphy = padapter->rtw_wdev->wiphy;
> @@ -2322,23 +2322,21 @@ static int rtw_cfg80211_add_monitor_if(struct 
adapter *padapter, char *name, str
> 
>  	ret = cfg80211_register_netdevice(mon_ndev);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		goto out;
> +		goto err_register;
>  	}
> 
>  	*ndev = pwdev_priv->pmon_ndev = mon_ndev;
>  	memcpy(pwdev_priv->ifname_mon, name, IFNAMSIZ+1);
> +	goto out;

I think this is the right thing to do in order to remove the bug you 
introduced in v1. Well done.

> 
> -out:
> -	if (ret && mon_wdev) {
> -		kfree(mon_wdev);
> -		mon_wdev = NULL;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (ret && mon_ndev) {
> -		free_netdev(mon_ndev);
> -		*ndev = mon_ndev = NULL;
> -	}
> +err_register:
> +	kfree(mon_wdev);
> +	mon_wdev = NULL;
> 
> +err_zmalloc:
> +	free_netdev(mon_ndev);
> +	*ndev = mon_ndev = NULL;

Not sure about what the Linux coding guidelines say, but I think that 
assigning NULL to local (on stack) pointers (mon_wdev, mon_ndev) at this 
point is unnecessary. There is no risk of reusing them after the "out" 
labelled block, because at function exit they are destroyed when the stack is 
unwound.

If you decide to remove these assignments, take care to leave "*ndev = NULL;" 
as-is (why?).

Aside from this minor objection...

Acked-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>

Thanks,

Fabio

> +out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> --
> 2.32.0
> 
> 
> 





  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-10  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-10  5:06 [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: os_dep: simplify the return statement Saurav Girepunje
2021-10-10  7:24 ` Fabio M. De Francesco [this message]
2021-10-11 18:10   ` Saurav Girepunje
2021-10-10  8:56 ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-10-10 12:59 ` Greg KH
2021-10-11  8:54 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-10-11 12:33   ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-10-11 18:36     ` Saurav Girepunje
2021-10-11 17:32   ` Saurav Girepunje
2021-10-11 12:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-10-11 18:28   ` Saurav Girepunje

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5843476.m7FxXixzUK@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabioaiuto83@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=insafonov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=marcocesati@gmail.com \
    --cc=ross.schm.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=saurav.girepunje@gmail.com \
    --cc=saurav.girepunje@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.