From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:17088 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763069AbcLSMCJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 07:02:09 -0500 From: "Thiagarajan, Vasanthakumar" To: Kalle Valo CC: Johannes Berg , "nbd@nbd.name" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] mac80211: Implement data xmit for 802.11 encap offload Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:02:00 +0000 Message-ID: <5857CC37.80003@qti.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20161219_130308_167628_8D40F52D) References: <1481781608-5181-1-git-send-email-vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com> <1481781608-5181-3-git-send-email-vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com> <1481794142.31776.5.camel@sipsolutions.net> <58528607.7090101@qti.qualcomm.com> <85c98160-3ee9-07db-cb4c-9e300f0ba798@nbd.name> <1481809984.2582.5.camel@sipsolutions.net> <58537DA3.1090901@qti.qualcomm.com> <878trckurn.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> In-Reply-To: <878trckurn.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 19 December 2016 05:15 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > "Thiagarajan, Vasanthakumar" writes: > >> On Thursday 15 December 2016 07:23 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: >>> >>>>> I agree. Dynamic switch part is buggy, we can start with not >>>>> allowing interfaces resulting in dynamic switch. >>>> >>>> Does this mean that when bringing up multiple interfaces, users would >>>> need to figure out the 'magic' order that works? >>> >>> I think we need to talk about hardware capabilities at this point. >> >> QCA988X does not have capability to configure vif specific decap mode. E= ncap mode >> is configurable per packet for all the ath10k based chips so this part s= hould be >> fine to support per vif configuration. Newer QCA chips like QCA9984, QCA= 4019, QCA9888 >> and QCA99X0 supports decap mode configuration per vif. > > When you say "all" are you also taking into account QCA6174 and QCA9377? Good point. I see some workarounds for QCA6174 to send data frames in ether= net mode, so QCA6174 should be fine in this regard. I assume QCA9377 also works fine = with ethernet encap configuration per htt desc, need to confirm. Vasanth=