From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42925) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdFWw-000067-QL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:19:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdFWv-0005uZ-6U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:19:58 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48125 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdFWv-0005uP-1v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:19:57 -0500 References: <1322178221-8481-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20111220074627.GA30877@cs.nctu.edu.tw> <7A16FF40-7FDE-4010-AADE-5065064BA691@suse.de> <20111221024348.GA49480@cs.nctu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <20111221024348.GA49480@cs.nctu.edu.tw> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <58627A1D-32A6-4ADC-9F90-2C92D126D690@suse.de> From: Alexander Graf Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:19:55 +0100 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: Fix 32-on-64 mmap for x86_64 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?utf-8?B?6Zmz6Z+L5Lu7?= Cc: Peter Maydell , "riku.voipio@iki.fi" , qemu-devel Developers On 21.12.2011, at 03:43, =E9=99=B3=E9=9F=8B=E4=BB=BB wrote: >>>> This patch is actually wrong and we should rather make proper -R values= the default instead of relying on MAP_32BIT. >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> I don't understand what "make proper -R values" means. Where/how we can a= pply >>> "-R"? >>=20 >> Please see my other mail about this: >>=20 >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-12/msg01697.html >=20 > Ah, "-R" should mean >=20 > -R size reserve size bytes for guest virtual address space Yes, that's what I was referring to :) Alex