All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 3/3] syscalls/getxattr04.c: Add new regression test
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 09:34:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58B8C80B.8080503@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170302162310.GB8152@rei.lan>

On 2017/03/03 0:23, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
Hi Cyril

Thanks for your comment, i will send v2 patch soon.

Regards,
Xiao Yang
> Hi!
>> + * Copyright (c) 2017 Fujitsu Ltd.
>> + * Author: Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> + * under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, but
>> + * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * alone with this program.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * This is a regression test for the race between getting an existing
>> + * xattr and setting/removing a large xattr.  This bug leads to that
>> + * getxattr() fails to get an existing xattr and returns ENOATTR in xfs
>> + * filesystem.
>> + *
>> + * Thie bug has been fixed in:
>> + *
>> + * commit 5a93790d4e2df73e30c965ec6e49be82fc3ccfce
>> + * Author: Brian Foster<bfoster@redhat.com>
>> + * Date:   Wed Jan 25 07:53:43 2017 -0800
>> + *
>> + * xfs: remove racy hasattr check from attr ops
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "config.h"
>> +#include<errno.h>
>> +#include<sys/types.h>
>> +#include<string.h>
>> +#include<unistd.h>
>> +#include<signal.h>
>> +
>> +#ifdef HAVE_SYS_XATTR_H
>> +# include<sys/xattr.h>
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#include "tst_test.h"
>> +
>> +#ifdef HAVE_SYS_XATTR_H
>> +
>> +#define MNTPOINT	"mntpoint"
>> +#define TEST_FILE	MNTPOINT "/file"
>> +#define TRUSTED_BIG	"trusted.big"
>> +#define TRUSTED_SMALL	"trusted.small"
>> +
>> +static int mount_flag;
>> +static int end;
> This should be volatile since it's changed from a signal handler.
>
>> +static char big_value[512];
>> +static char small_value[32];
>> +
>> +static void sigproc(int sig)
>> +{
>> +	end = sig;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void loop_getxattr(void)
>> +{
>> +	int res;
>> +
>> +	while (1) {
>> +		res = getxattr(TEST_FILE, TRUSTED_SMALL, NULL, 0);
>> +		if (res == -1) {
>> +			if (errno == ENODATA) {
>> +				tst_res(TFAIL, "getxattr() failed to get an "
>> +					"existing attribute");
>> +			} else {
>> +				tst_res(TFAIL | TERRNO,
>> +					"getxattr() failed without ENOATTR");
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			return;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (end)
>> +			break;
> Why not just while (!end) { ... } ?
>
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	tst_res(TPASS, "getxattr() succeeded to get an existing attribute");
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void verify_getxattr(void)
>> +{
>> +	pid_t pid;
>> +	int n;
>> +
>> +	pid = SAFE_FORK();
>> +	if (!pid) {
>> +		loop_getxattr();
>> +		_exit(0);
>                    ^
> 		  Why _exit()? We are not calling this code from a
> 		  signal handler, are we?
>
> Also why don't we call exit() in the loop_getxattr() function?
>
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	for (n = 0; n<  99; n++) {
>> +		SAFE_SETXATTR(TEST_FILE, TRUSTED_BIG, big_value,
>> +				sizeof(big_value), XATTR_CREATE);
>> +		SAFE_REMOVEXATTR(TEST_FILE, TRUSTED_BIG);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	kill(pid, SIGUSR1);
>> +	tst_reap_children();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void setup(void)
>> +{
>> +	SAFE_SIGNAL(SIGUSR1, sigproc);
>> +
>> +	SAFE_MKDIR(MNTPOINT, 0755);
>> +	SAFE_MKFS(tst_device->dev, "xfs", NULL, NULL);
>> +	SAFE_MOUNT(tst_device->dev, MNTPOINT, "xfs", 0, NULL);
>> +	mount_flag = 1;
> You should make use of the mount_device flag introduced meanwhile:
>
> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/Test-Writing-Guidelines#2214-testing-with-a-block-device
>
>> +	SAFE_TOUCH(TEST_FILE, 0644, NULL);
>> +
>> +	memset(big_value, 'a', sizeof(big_value));
>> +	memset(small_value, 'a', sizeof(small_value));
>> +
>> +	SAFE_SETXATTR(TEST_FILE, TRUSTED_SMALL, small_value,
>> +			sizeof(small_value), XATTR_CREATE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void cleanup(void)
>> +{
>> +	if (mount_flag)
>> +		tst_umount(MNTPOINT);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct tst_test test = {
>> +	.tid = "getxattr04",
>> +	.needs_tmpdir = 1,
>> +	.needs_root = 1,
>> +	.needs_device = 1,
>> +	.forks_child = 1,
>> +	.test_all = verify_getxattr,
>> +	.setup = setup,
>> +	.cleanup = cleanup
>> +};
>> +
>> +#else /* HAVE_SYS_XATTR_H */
>> +	TST_TEST_TCONF("<sys/xattr.h>  does not exist.");
>> +#endif
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp




  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-03  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-02 10:37 [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] safe_macros: remove unused code in xattr related functions Xiao Yang
2017-03-02 10:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/3] safe_macros: add safe_removexattr() Xiao Yang
2017-03-02 10:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/3] syscalls/getxattr04.c: Add new regression test Xiao Yang
2017-03-02 16:23   ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-03-03  1:21     ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/3] syscalls/getxattr04.c: add " Xiao Yang
2017-03-03  2:14       ` Xiao Yang
2017-03-03  1:34     ` Xiao Yang [this message]
2017-03-03  2:18     ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 " Xiao Yang
2017-03-03  9:57       ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-03-06  8:50         ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 " Xiao Yang
2017-03-06  9:58           ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58B8C80B.8080503@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.