From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rahul Jain Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:08:35 +0530 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/6] libubox: enable static build In-Reply-To: <29802569-43e0-ee44-da29-d7f76d6002d9@mind.be> References: <1490359795-18362-1-git-send-email-Rahul.Jain@imgtec.com> <1490359795-18362-6-git-send-email-Rahul.Jain@imgtec.com> <29802569-43e0-ee44-da29-d7f76d6002d9@mind.be> Message-ID: <58DB8EAB.2030309@imgtec.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Arnout, Thanks for your comments. On Friday 24 March 2017 06:37 PM, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > > On 24-03-17 13:49, Rahul Jain wrote: >> upstream has added the support to build the static libraries. >> update comment for BR2_STATIC_LIBS for other packages having >> dependency on libubox. > > The reason why that comment is there, is so we remember that when libubox is > allowed to be built statically, we should check if ubus and ustream-ssl perhaps > now also can be built statically. So, did you check that? If yes, you should > update the comment as to why they can't be build statically (e.g. "dlopen()", > see other Config.in files). I have checked package cmake files and found out that there is no support for building static libraries in ubus and ustream-ssl packages. I will add a comment '#no support to build static libraries in config file'.