All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, paul.durrant@citrix.com,
	Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/emulate: implement hvmemul_cmpxchg() with an actual CMPXCHG
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 03:07:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58E37E8B020000780014C789@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8962b91c-2fa3-b17d-b6d9-4b533343ebe9@bitdefender.com>

>>> On 03.04.17 at 20:36, <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com> wrote:
> Another log, making sure that the MMIO emulation fail really happens on
> the same processor as the preceding (identical bytes) fail:
> 
> (XEN) [8] gfn: 0x276f
> (XEN) [11] virtual address: 0x8276f09c, rc: 0
> (XEN) [8] virtual address: 0x8276f09c, rc: 4
> (XEN) Dump follows for VCPU 8
> (XEN) Mem event (RETRY) emulation failed: d3v8 32bit @ 0008:826a3861 ->
> f0 0f ba 30 00 72 07 8b cb e8 da 4b ff ff 8b 45

So what does your code do following this? Namely is there any exit
back to guest context prior to the retried operation succeeding (e.g.
are you allowing the instruction to be re-executed)? If there is, I'd
suspect you don't clean up some internal state and ...

> (XEN) [11] gfn: 0x276f
> (XEN) [11] virtual address: 0x8276f0d0, rc: 0
> (XEN) [11] gfn: 0x276f
> (XEN) [11] virtual address: 0x8276f09c, rc: 0
> (XEN) [11] gfn: 0x276f
> (XEN) [11] virtual address: 0x8276f0cc, rc: 0
> (XEN) [11] gfn: 0x276f
> (XEN) [11] virtual address: 0x8276f09c, rc: 0
> (XEN) [8] gfn: 0xfed00
> (XEN) !page
> (XEN) hvmemul_vaddr_to_mfn() fail
> (XEN) [8] virtual address: 0xffd080f0, rc: 1
> (XEN) Dump follows for VCPU 8
> (XEN) MMIO emulation failed: d3v8 32bit @ 0008:8263df3c -> f0 0f ba 30
> 00 72 07 8b cb e8 da 4b ff ff 8b 45

... this then happens in the context of an interrupt taken on
the instruction to be re-executed (i.e. before it actually gets
re-executed). "Normal" retry processing is not supposed to
reach guest context again, i.e. the retry is being performed
from (iirc) hvm_do_resume(). Hence it can re-use previously
collected information on the instruction and its operand(s).
Any exit to guest context, otoh, would require invalidation of
such internally cached state.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-04  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-24 13:24 [PATCH RFC] x86/emulate: implement hvmemul_cmpxchg() with an actual CMPXCHG Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-28  9:14 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-28 10:03   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 10:25     ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-28 10:44       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-29  5:59       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-29  8:14         ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-28 10:27     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-28 10:47       ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-28 10:50         ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-28 11:32           ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-29 13:55           ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-29 14:00             ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-29 15:04               ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-29 15:49                 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-30 12:05                   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-30 12:25                     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-30 12:56                     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-30 14:08                       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-30 14:21                         ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-30 15:05                           ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-30 15:47                             ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31  6:17                               ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-31  7:34                                 ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31  9:56                                   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-31 14:46                                     ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-31 15:01                                       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-03-31 15:04                                         ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-01 16:56                                           ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-04-03 10:23                                             ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-03 18:20                                             ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-04-03 18:36                                               ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-04-04  9:07                                                 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2017-04-04 12:01                                                   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-04-08 22:15                                                 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-04-09 11:03                                                   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2017-04-10 10:18                                                   ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-29 14:12             ` Razvan Cojocaru

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58E37E8B020000780014C789@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.